[xzins]

. He would still be just if He passed over all of us.

I disagree at this point. It would make him apathetic, not just, to pass over all of us. Apathy is unjust....a mere few steps away from negligence if you wish to consider the law.

However, I also acknowledge that you're simply trying to emphasize our unworthiness....which I agree with.

The list of church fathers above seems to really lock in the proper interpretation of the scripture. On all sides, the case for a biblical unlimited atonement is resoundingly conclusive.

[xzins]

You may have good intentions (even though I adamantly think you are wrong regarding Calvinism being bad theology), but the tone of your posts is very divisive. It is possible to argue a point without exagerating it to the point of distortion

I have yet to see EVEN ONE c'vist on this page attempt to argue Wesley-Arminianism WITHOUT distorting it. I can decide that's because they don't believe it and that that makes it somehow psychologically impossible for them to fairly represent it. I can argue that they don't understand it. I can argue that they intentionally distort it. It is really a combination of all 3.