Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/09/2002 5:12:51 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JMJ333
Bookmarking this for reference.
2 posted on 06/09/2002 5:25:05 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333; patent; siobhan; sinkspur; maryz; sitetest; neocon
I think some of this author's conclusions are terribly presumptuous on his part, and Janet Smith helped debunk some of his thesis in the same issue of Latin Mass Magazine.

For the entire sordid tale, (particularly Janet Smith's Response and Ronald McArthur's Response) see the timeline of the controversy at the Seattle Catholic web site.

My conclusion is that Humanae Vitae is to Castii Canubii what the Novus Ordo Missae mass is to the Tridentine Latin Mass, i.e., yeah, its Catholic, and it teaches Truth, but like the new mass, it ain't always pretty, and it ain't necessarily an improvement on what came before it.

The fact that the two most significant acts of Pope Paul VI were the promulgation of the New Mass and the publication of Humanae Vitae, somehow links these two important developments in my mind.

The poor theology related in the vernacular translations of the Latin (but not, necessarily in the Latin itself!) of the Novus Ordo Missae has lead to decreased belief in the Real Presence, and decreased awareness that the mass IS the Supreme Sacrifice. In my opinion, it also increased the rate of falling away from the faith that accompanied this post-modern, post Christian moment, ushered in by the sexual revolution, which in turn was enabled by the introduction of the Pill in 1959/1960.

So a critical examination of Humanae Vitae is indeed a legitimate endeavor, and in such examination, if Humanae Vitae seems to come up lacking, it is still no less authoritative than the new mass itself, if we are to believe the Gates Shall Not Prevail.

6 posted on 06/09/2002 5:51:56 PM PDT by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
Interesting analysis, although I think it's a little extreme. However, the author is correct when he states that the move away from teleology has resulted in much confusion. It is, I suppose, just another part of the general movement towards subjectivity that has afflicted every discipline, not only theology, over the last several decades.

Of course, the result in theology has been particularly dramatic, since it has reduced what was a science to a mere feeling. As american_colleen said, it's now become "Jesus is our friend" garbage, babbled about by people who should know better.

20 posted on 06/10/2002 6:19:25 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
As Fr. John Hardon, S.J., has said, "Professed Catholics who practice contraception either give up the practice of contraception or they give up their Catholic faith."

Given the current uproar in the church, couldn't someone with a less ... incendiary name have been found to make this statement?

70 posted on 07/01/2002 10:01:30 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson