Free Republic

COVID PING

I know there were many gentle souls who simply trusted, and never wanted the unvaxxed to sicken and die.

The reason I posted it was because I had in mind the ‘advocates’ demanding that we be denied medical treatment and claiming that we ‘deserve’ to die. I should have posted that quote with something focused pointing to the target audience - the vicious pro-vaxxers, and excluding the citizens merely caught in the crossfire, trying to protect their grandma, trying to keep their jobs etc.

Covid 'Vaccine' PING

The Japanese have had 7 boosters at this point.

From comments below an anti-c19 'vaccine' video I watched:

"You watched us refuse the jab and hoped we would die, we watched you take the jab and prayed you would be ok"

@SpartaJustice on X (Ivan Raiklin)

ransomnote:

It's like de-ja-vu all over again.

I prepared a post which I believed to be new and just before posting it, I realized I've already read it or posted it on the Q thread (yeah - it's been 'that kind' of week).

So I put a copy of the X post of an interview with Ivan Raiklan in Festival for those who didn't see it, or like me, forgot it.

According to the source (Ivan Raiklin), Elon Musk has the Twitter files going back to 2016 that prove extensive treasonous acts - much of what we learned about from Q. There's a video at the X link - the first 5 minutes or so seems like straight Q. Raiklin, who refers to the FBI as the "F-B-Lie", names following FBI agents, saying, "Those are the individuals at the FB-Lie that run the Censorship-Industrial Complex on behalf of this illegitimate regime."

1. Brian Auten
2. Laura Dehmlow
3. Joe Pienka
4. Elvis Chan

I checked for sources to prove there were FBI agents with these names and gave example links below.

1 Investigating the investigators: FBI sent list of six demands in wake of ‘bogus information’ from informants Judiciary.house.gov November 30, 2022 

"FBI supervisory intelligence analyst Brian Auten told the court that neither Steele nor Danchenko ever provided evidence corroborating the key claims of the anti-Trump dossier...."

2. FBI official tied to suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story is STILL involved in briefing Facebook and Twitter on 'disinformation', report reveals  DailyMail.co.uk Nov 2, 2022

"An FBI official who contributed to shaping the decision of social media platforms to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story is still briefing Facebook and Twitter about foreign influence threats, according to a recent report."

3. Gregg Jarrett: Comey's FBI was running a secret counterintelligence operation against Trump, new docs show FoxNews.com August 12, 2019

"To circumvent the rules they were breaking, the FBI set up an “information laundering scheme.” Steele would feed information to Ohr, who would pass it to his “handler” Joe Pienka, who would feed it to his partner Peter Strzok, who would give it to Andrew McCabe, who would deliver it to Comey."

4. House Republicans sue FBI agent for bucking censorship investigation Judiciary.house.gov February 6, 2024

"The House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit against a longtime FBI agent on Tuesday for refusing to comply with a subpoena, accusing the agent of hindering the committee's investigation into social media censorship practices by declining to appear for a deposition."

 

Posting the following long X post in Festival for reference because I believe it's already been posted 'somewhere'.

https://x.com/SpartaJustice/status/1796642190476673503

Truth Justice ™

@SpartaJustice

JUSTICE FOR AMERICA AND TRUMP: Former U.S. Green Beret and U.S. Constitutional Attorney confirms the FBI is America's #1 most dangerous Domestic Terrorist Organization and the Department of Justice is the Enemy of America and our Constitutional Order. He promises to crush them.

His team has created a list with 350 names of those that have committed crimes at the highest level in America including Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Joseph R. Biden, Jill Biden, General Mark Milley, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Tony Podesta, Huma Abedin, Nancy Pelosi, Mike Pence, Christopher Wray, Andrew McCabe, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, Elvis Chan, Lindsey Graham, Christopher Steele, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and many more all involved in the unlawful 2020 Presidential Election, the Illegal spying on President Trump, the Hunter Biden Laptop Coverup, the Trump Impeachment and the J6 staged events.

He says there are over 80,000 former and retired military men and women willing to be deputized by local Sheriff's in order to arrest all 350 names on this Corruption list. In order to prosecute and arrest the named individuals his team needs Elon Musk to release the Twitter files that contain all the communication and evidence that would indict these named individuals.

A message to Elon Musk "Elon Musk if you are watching this, do the right thing. You say that you love this country and that you are a free speech absolutist. We the people should have the right to see what is in the Twitter files." America needs your help Elon Musk to expose and end this corruption that is destroying our country and the world.

He vows consequences for the 350 names on his Deep State target list regardless of who wins the 2024 Presidential Election because his team is going after the Justice Department by engaging with local counties and States in order to crush the Department of Justice, they are the enemy of America.

The swatting and raids of the 350 named corrupt individuals will be live streamed and carried out lawfully, morally and ethically. Justice is coming.
May 31, 2024

*ransomnote: 20 minute video interview with Ivan Raiklin at link

I’ve seen speculation that Cohen has a plea deal with prosecution saying he will receive immunity for anything he admits to in trial in exchange for his testimony. If true that would explain his offering information that I would have expected he would conceal about his actions.

• Trump remains resolute as ever — he tells The Post a guilty verdict won’t impact his sleep or campaign: ‘Some people say I’m a warrior’

  6/1/2024, 9:18:41 PM · by Libloather · 12 replies

  NY Post ^ | 6/01/24 | Michael Goodwin

*head slapping moment when I realize I forgot to break my giga post into 2 or 3 parts to post separately*

This is a long post from ransomnote to Bob Ireland with Q's statements about information warfare/warriors and the digital battlefield, in addition to examples of my prior efforts to recruit protestors. To skip it, scroll down to gif of a reconnaissance operative hiding in the bushes.

Bob,

I appreciate your work in clarifying. ThankQ. I'm used to calls to 'water the tree of libery' tied with mentions of the Revolutionary War pushing for more than red-pilling, so my understanding of your arm icon was not personal. In tandem with Revolutionary War references, I get the impression that you feel information warfare doesn't really 'count' as doing anything in your frustration with public activity or lack thereof (i.e., NOTHING IS HAPPENING!).

Because you've been here with us for these years, I assumed you knew of my prior efforts to cultivate public response through protest, calling, writing, voting etc. so your objection to my record (i.e., your apparent belief that I am against advocacy or resistance efforts) made me think some clarification could be useful. If you're not interested, there's the gif of the 'operative in the bushes'  is below (and it's cute). :D

Also, in my search through the attic for the posts below, I saw signs that you had been contending with serious illness back then, and I paused to be grateful for your continued presence on our threads.

I'm posting the following to clarify possible misunderstandings of what I do and do not advocate for, most of the content in the post below hasn't been seen in about 4 years so I have hopes it won't put you to sleep!

I pulled together information and comments about 2 events wherein I advocated for in-person protests despite personal risk. I feel there is a time and place and context to call for literally talking a stand, and that I have done so. I do find it odd that somehow my posts have been interpreted to mean I want to 'do nothing' and wait for other people to step in and handle it.

In each instance (below), there were people advocating for both sides (protest or 'avoid the trap'); I just want to clarify that 'sitting drinking coffee' versus 'taking a stand' are a false dichotomy, and deciding when/where to protest is based on judgement, available information and knowledge.

1 Richmond Virginia, 1/20/2024 2nd Ammendment Protests

The Q thread covering the time of the 2nd Ammendment Protests in Richmond, Virginia, scheduled to take place Jan 20, 2020 is linked below.

• Q Anon: 01/17/20 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.208, Q Day 812

  1/17/2020, 10:35:29 PM · by ransomnote · 1,532 replies

  qmap.pub ^ | 01/17/20 | FReepers

At that time I was advocating for MAGA/FREEQs/FREEPERS to attend the protest despite the risks. Others, either stood by monitoring the flow of information with concern, urged caution (avoidance) instead, supported protest or contributed more context (your post on that thread), and you all did so with good reason because we were trying to evaluate the context, weigh the options, detect and avoid traps that make (psyops) matters worse for America, and for Trump. I didn't think less of those urging us to avoid possible traps (e.g., lazy, sitting drinking coffee) because together we balance each other out and distill our insights into judgements we can use.

The day after I posted our Q thread, I took my concerns to the forum and posted the following thread, asking veteran FReeper protestors to contribute their experience to our protest strategies.

• FREEPER ALERT: Virginia is a test case for the Deep State. Let's make them FAIL!

  1/18/2020, 12:05:04 AM · by ransomnote · 126 replies

  01/17/20 | Vanity

Excerpted:

FReeper Patriots, SHOW US HOW IT'S DONE

.....I will do my best but I want strategies to have the most impact from my efforts.

We have seasoned FReepers; we have new blood with new ideas, we have people of every level of experience in between. We have people with communications expertise, political savvy. We want our efforts to be strategic and have maximum impact. 

IDEAS. We need your experience, your professional skills. Frankly, if we don't show the Deep State holdovers that we will flood their phone lines, stage Social Media campaigns, protest their presence, any legal public action needed to drive them from office, our states are next in line.

.....And any elected official either supporting or silent regarding the abuses going on now in Virginia shouldn't bother running for office again anywhere, ever.

We must act now - Virginians need us and the Deep State is WATCHING.

Note that post #49 on that forum thread (and #111 on the active Q thread), I elaborated on my reasons for urging protests, encouraged peeps to 'flood the zone', proposed a counter-strategy, and I asked people to accept personal risk. The following is an excerpt:

Attending the rally involves personal risk, as has every fight for our freedom since the founding of America. We must pray for to strength, fortitude, and protection of all who attend the even in VA as well as across the nation.

I linked that forum thread back to the Q thread, and sent that link as a ping  to all those on the Q thread ping list.

I also moved my analysis of a psyop attempt (viral email) from my forum post to the Q thread here (#105). That viral email was designed to discourage attendance at the protest via an 'anonymous' warning and my analysis was intended to prove it was a psyop.

I then posted another forum thread exhorting FReepers to attend the rally, call, emal, tweet etc.

• FReepers - We are all Virginians now. Let's support VA. Call, Email, Tweet, ATTEND THE VA RALLY on Monday

  1/18/2020, 4:04:31 PM · by ransomnote · 74 replies

  1/18/20 | Vanity

I made other threads asking FReepers to text, call, or vote a different times over the past 4 or 5 years. I do so more carefully now, because I believe that voter pressure works less as the Deep State increases its own pressure on the same Congress Critters - ignoring us helps them protect against DS blackmail/threats. I won't rule out such forum threads or post in the future, but I didn't feel particularly effective calling for phone campaigns etc. back then, likely also because the fix was in for the election(s).

I also tried to advocate for FReepers on FR to take a stand for President Trump at what was then described as impending George Flyod 'protests'. I posted a forum thread in an attempt to recruit protestors.

2. George Floyd Protests near Lafayette Park, May 30 - June 1, 2020

• Support President Trump - Don't Let the Deep State Take The White House. ALL ABLE PATRIOTS NEED TO TAKE A STAND OUTSIDE THE WHITE HOUES

  6/5/2020, 9:19:49 PM · by ransomnote · 107 replies

  6/5/2020 | vanity

   

  Here's a 4 pagraph excerpt in which I encourage people to accept a degree of personal risk:

  RISE, TAKE A STAND
  

  I received a somewhat horrified email asking how I could, in good conscience advocate that all able Americans go to the White House to stand in support of our President when doing so could put citizens without military training directly in harms way.

  I give my response here because it's an important question,  and because we will remain "In The Zone" of personal readiness to take a stand until the Deep State is defeated.

  First and foremost - I advocate that patriots go to DC to stand outside the White House in support of the President despite risks involved, because after almost 3 years of investigating, I have some idea how "safe" those same patriots will be if the Deep State takes control.

  There is winning this battle, and there is dying. I personally don't believe "losing" is anything more than a matter of days or months prior to "dying".

I don't think my thread was particularly useful in recruiting protestors - I posted it the day of  the protest and FR is largely older people living in CA, many with physical limitations and this 'protest' devolved into steady violence. In hindsight, I believe my urging FReepers to attend the 'protest' was an incorrect over-reaction to protest unknowns which were later mentioned by Q in drop 4404. While the context was wrong, my words regarding taking a personal stand despite the risks were correct.

I am infuriated that the MSM described the riots as 'mostly peaceful', even though around 60 Secret Service members were injuried.

At least 60 Secret Service members injured during protests near White House - June 1, 2020

SIDE NOTE: Q linked to President Trump's (6/4/2020) post in which the President linked to an open letter from John M Dowd to Jim (Mattis). I link it because in the letter, Stoddard decried Mattis' silence on, among other things, "...the resistance movement to paralyze our courts and our government operations."  These are an example of the kind of optics  my instincts cautioned me about in my prior post to you - I said that the 'shutdown' of courts or Congress could be portrayed as insurrectionist.

https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1268675068814659584

HERE IS THE LETTER PRESIDENT TRUMP RECOMMENDED THAT WE READ

The actions of 'digital warriors' can seem unimportant to some, but WE SERVE OUR COUNTRY with our efforts in the information war, according to Q.

Q4509

OUR SERVICE is, in fact, some important that Q asked us to take the oath at the bottom of Q4510.

In Q4511 said this important Digital Battlefield is a unprecedented MIL-CIV alliance.

Those of us called to service on the Digital Battlefield do so to the best of our ability. Others are called to serve in other ways, to the best of their ability. Our skills and service complement one another.

Amen to your latest comment to me, Bob!

"Let us continue to unite for freedom's fight and the righteousness of God."

• Alex Jones just broadcast today that government is right now in the process of attempting to illegally seize the InfoWars studios

  6/1/2024, 3:20:28 PM · by janetjanet998 · 44 replies

  X ^

ransomnote's long response to Bob Ireland. To skip it scroll down to a gif of a prank to play on liberals this summer.

ThankQ for your prior posts detailing busines/court/Congress shutdowns. I read them and forgot to include them because of my feeling about those strategies at this time. I did not properly acknowledge your proposals and for that I apologize.

I'm not against shut downs. I have advocated for shutdowns back in the Covid plandemic days and was unsuccessful in interesting anyone in discussing it. I wouldn't have the resources to organize or motivate people in real life who felt as I did so I resumed red-pilling online where I can 'do more good'.

Part of our divide is our perception of how things are going.

You said: "The 'Rats seem totally unconcerned about the outcome of this election. I hope they are wrong and are caught with their pants down - but I have doubts; they don't❗'

But I believe the DNC/Biden regime is flailing for its life. I suppose if I thought it were more confident, I would believe a shutdown of our legal system might have an impact - but still I personally don't have the social reach IRL to organize or motivate such a move. Our legal system is supposed to function outside of politics and the MSM gladiator ring would portray such a move as a political attack.

You said, " Unhappily, I have lost confidence in elections. I know what happened in 2020 and anyone questioning that outcome has been labeled an insurrectionist by the corrupt DoJ. None of that is happening... NOTHING is happening."

In the present context, I believe this same 'labeling an insurrectionist' by the DOJ would be repeated, but with greater intensity, on members of the legal community, particularly now that DJT has been falsely convicted (i.e., seen as retaliatory). The same with shutting down Congress - it would be portrayed as insurrectionist, IMHO.

Another aspect of 'how things are going' upon which we don't agree; you feel 'nothing is happening' and I significant matters taking place as the battle between good and evil heats up.

I think I misinterpreted your statement, "The American people will HAVE to stand up and take control of their govt 💪 or stop all the whining."

I interpreted the 'fist' in your post as 'get physically agressive'. I responded by pointing to the over-reaction of the DOJ to mere public assembly and the performance of free speech, along with the right citizens have to walk into the Capitol grounds when police open the gates/doors and welcome them in.

I said it thusly, Brave, legitimate patriot heros, including Trump, did stand up and protest on Jan 6 - they weren't whining. Most of the protesters are still abused in jail. Biden wants us to protest so he can call it another violent threat to democracy and strip us of the right to assembly, free speech, 2nd amendment by claiming MAGA is laboring to overthrow the country.

You responded with: I say Americans need to stand up and I give some good examples, examples tried in history and you respond with the idea that those standing up would be punished by the masses that don't care about Constitutional abuses.

I didn't say the uncaring masses would punish protestors and didn't intend to imply it. I specified actions I believe Brandon would take (attack on our constitutional rights etc.)

I don't support legal system and Congressional shutdowns at this time, and I didn't mention the timing and context issues before, while Trump is being threatened by the DOJ because I beleive it would be cast as retaliatory for his conviction.

I didn't address your 'businesses shut down' before. I advocated for that during the plandemic - a time when businesses were already suffering (yeah, my timing was off). I'm not against the idea of businesses conducting shutdowns, but successful boycots (Bud Light) show that the public is often not brought together by tactics which can be seen, and will be portrayed in the media, as political  punishments.

You said, You wouldn't have been very popular in the American Revolution. You seem to say not to fight or do much of anything and somebody else will solve our problems.

Your statement about American Revolutionaries here supported my interpretation of your use of the 💪 icon (physical aggression, sabotague). Revolutionary warriors did not conduct business or legal shutdowns to my knowledge and had they done so, I'd be looking at their context/timing versus ours before I gave an opinion. So If I am wrong about what your 💪 icon, and reference to the contrast between my position and that popular during the American Revolution are meant to imply, then please help me catch up. 

Shutdowns the MSM will portray as political retaliation have the potential to be divisive so I'd need details and context before I supported them. The 'other side' could respond with shutdowns or boycotts of their own. This polarization would come at a time when Trump has brought our country together like never before.

In the wrong context, or the wrong timing, the result could be reminiscent of the Civil War, and not the Revolutionary War. Trump/Q are not pacifists; they know the CIA/DS specialize in civil unrest by any means 'neccessary' and the cabal created organizations like the UN to make sure they would 'get' to decide who wins such conflicts. That's why their overall strategy maintains the public peace, and the DS continuously tries to destabilize it. Protest - yes, but when and where appropriate. Ditto shutdowns.

Here you contrast what you see as 'our' behavior (sitting enjoying our coffee).

You said, "To think that we can sit back and enjoy our coffee while our champion is threatened with prison and possible murder - well, as I say, not in the American Revolution.

There's a reason we've been hammered on by trolls since the beginning. The Information War is real and we are fighting in it. Again, your reference here to the American Revolution

You said: I guess we will have to agree to disagree. If they come to get me for standing up against them and accusing me of insurrection and do me harm - well, give me liberty or give me death! WWG1WGA❗"

Depending on the circumstances, we may be standing beside you. The current circumstances are best served by Trump/Q strategies.

Because I always think of sabotague/violence, I searched to finds protest content from the Revolutionary period. This is is an excerpt of marketing information in the online museum's website (emphasis mine).

Protest in Early America Discovery

The American Revolution transformed how people around the world thought about protest. You may have heard of the most dramatic protest events of the 1760s and 1770s, like the Boston Tea Party and the Boston Massacre. But throughout the Revolutionary era, Americans of all sorts pioneered new forms of protest and debated what kinds of protests were legitimate. They questioned not just what people were protesting but also who was protesting and how they went about it.

With the ratification of the Constitution, protest became not a dangerous last resort but rather a core American right enshrined in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, which guarantees citizens the rights of assembly, speech, and petition. Americans still debate when it is acceptable to engage in a protest, what qualifies as a necessary one, and even what to call specific acts of protest.

With this discovery cart, learn how early Americans used boycotts, printed propaganda, violence, and public demonstrations to advocate for various causes, and consider the similarities and differences between the 18th century through to today.

At this point I am questioning, not what people should protest, but how such protests supports or detracts from Trump/Q's plans, the timing/optics/outcomes, etc. So in this regard - my questioning of best tactics is compatible with Revolutionary War history.

Note the Revolutionary warriors fought with information warfare ('printed propaganda'). Our efforts to red-pill the public with the truth to break through the MSM/CIA psyops and propaganda domains are again compatible with the resistance during the Revolutionary war. SOMETHING is happening, Bob. And WE are DOING it. Yes - we have to keep eyes out and cultivate more and better strategies, but we're not just sitting here enjoying our coffee while DJT is threatened with death. The public needs to support DJT and by breaking through MSM lies with red-pilling, we help them see WHY he's worth it. Their attitudes have changed from 2016 to present, and we helped change hearts and minds by sharing the truth.

Trump/Q said, 'Get loud, be heard.' There's still room for protest, but first comes strategy. I'm not personally organizing them because I lack the resources and am more effective in the 'Revolutionary' information war  effort.

I said, and still say, "What is routinely missing from exasperated complaints, about perceived inactivity of our dedicated patriots volunteering in the information war, is any sort of strategy.

You said, "Individual protests and protest groups are good, but they will largely be ignored by the Pravda media. FR red pilling is good... but the overall public will not be much awakened to stand up. FReepers could try to organize such community protests at home - in coordination with each other."

Good details! It sounds like you may feel called to organize such community protests!

As I previously said, ....We need numbers at protests - I'm not good at in-person recruiting and public speaking, but maybe you are. Or have you found a group or groups worth supporting? Then share the information about the groups so we can assess and update our knowledge and potential need for comfortable shoes with which to attend protests.

....We may ALL, to the best of our ability, serve time in protests or at rallies, collect signatures or funds for the effort, at various times but for now, I know my calling is in the information war, where at present, I can do the most good.

Perhaps your skill set as a communicator, organizer, motivator etc. is leading you to invest your efforts in the visible displays of support you might be referring to. Prayers up for your success in wherever you are called.

You said, "Do you know what ended the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt in the 'Arab Spring' (another CIA color revolution)❓ A massive public shutdown of everything for one day. The streets were filled with people - protesters and casuals together. Imagine Egypt showing ➡America👈 how to fight for freedom❗❗❗❗"

I think that's possible among the unified public. It would take substantial organizing and during that time period, Antifa would be gearing up to disrupt and this time I think the false flagging would be done on an unprecedented scale. I don't know how to prevent the Biden regime from false flagging in key cities and then shutting down the right to assemble, the right to online groups (FR) etc. But those touch on skills sets and access I don't have. It's worth praying about - asking for insight and wisdom how best to protest/resist.

You said (rn: emphasis mine), "I advocate for widespread national protests by any and various groups to demonstrate to the smug tyrants that we the people are not going to accept this lying down. You think that is unnecessary because the Dems are in full panic mode. I don't see their actions as panic - but even if the British Red Coats were in panic in the American Revolution, they still sent an army to crush the resistance❗"

I mentioned the Dems full panic mode to mean they know they are losing and the public is uniting against them. I did not mean to imply resistance or protest is unnecessary, instead I have pointed to the effective strategies I favor now in play by Q/Q+ and which has created rat panic. Again, I am not against protest but I personally am not investing my time in that effort at this time because I'm focused on the information war effort. If I see info or groups forming to enact protests I feel will be effective, I will then share that information out. SOmetimes we just don't have enough information about organizers or intents (remember that Capitol 'protest' mainly attended by the FBI?) so I have to be careful with what I share or post as threads.

Sidenote: I've been meaning to post this theory but haven't seen a place to do it.
I believe that the Abbercrombie and Fitch appareled CIA/FBI agents photographed and mocked at the failed Capitol protest were dressed like that (identically dressed and groomed like CIA/FBI) specifically to be photographed and mocked. If they were not supposed to stand out - they would have dressed to blend in like they usually do when infiltrating such events, and have done worldwide for decades. If they were 'normal' agitator 'inserts' instead of intel props, the MSM's cameras would never have found them. They would have waited for the crowd to fill in first before entering the green instead of standing there like dandelions in an otherwise perfect lawn.

I believe there were other inconspicuously attired CIA/FBI there waiting to cause mayhem. When violence broke out, the  'choir boy' dandelions would be tracked by the cameras as they pretended to 'heroically' subdue their normally dressed colleague infiltrators. At which point, the Abercrombie/Fitch choir boys would be reported as good-guy CIA/FBI operatives 'just doing their jobs' protecting the public from MAGA insurrectionists. Leaving the CIA/FBI dandelions in place when the crowd didn't show up still was a successful psyop, because the public was led to believe these traitors are just silly, easily identified buffoons of little threat, instead of the ruthless blood thirsty traitors they are.

I feel the same way about the marching fake patriots dressed identically and carrying flags. Mocked, laughed at, but law abiding and stupidly obvious. Elsewhere the CIA/FBI traitors are at work, dressed to blend in, trying to kill democracy. Classic misdirection - one hand attracts attention while the otherhand wields the weapon.

The following is British but I couldn't resist because our 45 was arrested by Puppet 'King' Biden. :D

"45" Shirt Buckle

 

This reproduction shirt buckle features the number "45" as a tribute to English politician John Wilkes. In the 45th issue of his newspaper, The North Briton, Wilkes sharply criticized King George III's speech at the 1763 opening of Parliament. The King immediately had Wilkes arrested. When the charges were dismissed and Wilkes was restored to his seat, the number "45" became a symbol of radical politics.

I found this theory interesting, because I wondered why Cohen seemed to be trashing his own credibility on the stand.

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled DOJ urged to 'take immediate action' to prosecute Michael Cohen over string of alleged lies, pepsi_junkie wrote to Mass55th:

Wouldn't surprise me if Bragg cut a deal with Cohen and any others who testified for him, that they wouldn't be prosecuted for any previous crimes that came to light during his/their testimony. Would explain why Cohen went out of his way to admit to stuff he didn't have to ... "Hey, I have an immunity deal for anything I say here in testimony today ... I'd better get a bunch of it out in that case!"

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/26/2024 Vol.493, Q Day 2403, Bob Ireland wrote:

Well, we seem to have disparate views of the current situation. Also, I think your singular determination has misled you in places. When I say, 'Americans need to stand up' you respond with 'Trump has stood up.' One of us is talking about chickens and the other about geese. Did I criticize Trump in any way? I say Americans need to stand up and I give some good examples, examples tried in history and you respond with the idea that those standing up would be punished by the masses that don't care about Constitutional abuses. You wouldn't have been very popular in the American Revolution. You seem to say not to fight or do much of anything and somebody else will solve our problems. When Q said 'WWG1WGA' and to beware of divisions arising, I interpret that for me to stand up with Trump, the Republicans to stand up with him, our representatives to stand up with him - which I later posted such by a group of Senators. Is it your theory that those Senators will be arrested or thrown out of the Senate? To think that we can sit back and enjoy our coffee while our champion is threatened with prison and possible murder - well, as I say, not in the American Revolution. I guess we will have to agree to disagree. If they come to get me for standing up against them and accusing me of insurrection and do me harm - well, give me liberty or give me death! WWG1WGA❗

Did I criticize Trump in any way?

No, nor did I intend my remarks to imply it. I was likely too vague - I meant he correctly stood up with Jan 6 Americans to display the will of the people to hold their government accountable. He was right, the protestors were right. None deserve the CCP 'treatment' they received. They have been used as (false) proof of the threat to democracy since that point; infuriating that those champions are deemed threats to democracy!

When we talk about protests now, I am looking for 'how is this situation different' and 'what needs to change this time?' or 'how can we make that(those) protest(s) most effective?" Trump asked for protestors at his arrest - protest is good when used wisely. I just want to see something more than  I've seen/heard to separate legitimate protest from the kind of protest Deep STate or agency protestors have in mind. How to prevent Jan 6 infiltration and providing more 'optics' to those claiming MAGA is dangerous? I don't want to give the Deep State optics opportunities whenever I can avoid it.

You wouldn't have been very popular in the American Revolution.

I see the American Revolution as the right strategies given resources and man power. That of course was a shooting war and what you are proposing is protests and public support. Right there I don't understand why those working the information war hotlines would presumably be failures in the eyes of Revolutionary War heroes. Those first American warriors were never in today's information war trenches and it doesn't diminish my gratitude and respect for them.

The Revolutionary War determined the course of freedom. I don't rule out the idea that a modern country could one day be placed under the kind of threat that would require Revlutionary War (modified) strategies and tactics. But Q and Q+ have been very clear that they do not want war and civil unrest. The 'Storm,' is based on Q/Q+'s strategies (stability) and communications (Q drops) and "the military is the only way" as well as the Q22.

I haven't seen how best we could borrow strategies from the Revolutionary War to the current tyranny. Simple logistics make my brain hurt - Revolutionary warriors could flood the zone because they didn't have to drive cars through known routes to reach protest sites etc. There's the need for protestors now to organize protests ahead of time to ensure they are free from violent (gov) instigators and in order to arrive in masse to put on an effective show of public support. At the same time, there's Brandon's DHS monitoring cell phone traffic for organizers and details. So I believe there are ways we can and should protest, but I don't see 'hurling ourselves against the doors' (acting without strategy) in protest.

If I were alive during the Revolutionary War, I would have known the resources, some or at least one of the leaders, and more useful information of needs and how to meet them.

Sadly, I am not a very impressive marksman and lack the valour of combat warriors, and my limited strength would see me take up a role for which I am more suited, perhaps caring for the wounded or working together with peers to support those who fight, get the word out, (ride on horseback yelling Reeeee!). I adapt to the circumstances, look for resources and like minded people to support and encourage, and I am said to be stubborn IRL so I hope I would do justice to America's Revolutionary war effort.

There's a meme around here saying,  "If you've every wondered what you would have been doing during WWII, you're doing it now." You're not on a thread with 'unengaged' coffee drinkers; adopting your (Bob's) personal perception of best courses of action is not a litmus test to determine who among us 'really' cares that Trump is being tormented, who among is is willing to sacrifice, or even to die for their country.

You seem to say not to fight or do much of anything and somebody else will solve our problems.

We really will have to agree to disagree there - I have no idea where and when I have ever said anything like that. I've quoted Q's 'stay together' and WWG1WGA etc. If you're implying that by holding a different view about how best to support President Trump, I'm pushing my responsibilities off on others - you're flat out wrong.

I do believe we will all likely have opportunities to protest and provide other visible, in-person support for the President (e.g., protests, campaigns etc.). Trump's strategies are peace and stability and support for the rule of law, had they been different tactics, I trust Americans to rise to them. America has always bled red, white and blue and I believe our military in particular would willingly die before surrendering to the Deep State. Many civilians would put their lives at stake in the way you suggest had this battle between Good and Evil required it, particularly if they had any understanding of what defeat for America would have meant. I support Trump's strategy (rule of law, comms, peaceful resistance) and that doesn't make me, or anyone else, lazy cowards.

I wouldn't public protests during Trump's current trial would be a good opportunity because the DS would manage the optics to their advantage. The MSM is warning that MAGA will now become violent - why give them the chance to 'spin it'. There are times to protest, but I want to have reason to believe it will have impact, and see a strategy behind it, and not protest to give directionless expression to my justifiable fury. There's never any focus in statements like, "We need to be doing something!" You might inspire more successfully if you detail your vision - just my 2 cents.

Is it your theory that those Senators will be arrested or thrown out of the Senate?

No, the DS is selective in attacking targets easily taken down. A person who merely walked into the Capitol on January 6 is easier to 'make an example of' via placing them in a windowless gulag than is someone like Donald J Trump. As I said, if they were to harm him now, the public would react in ways it never would have before. They know and gauge reactions/resources etc.

To think that we can sit back and enjoy our coffee while our champion is threatened with prison and possible murder - well, as I say, not in the American Revolution.

We're nearing our 500 thread effort to win the information war effort and we have many battles behind us (and more ahead). Bagster used to grumble that those who insist we're 'sitting back and enjoying our coffee' did not take into account his effectiveness in red-pilling and keeping comm lines open in the forum, despite his reliance on oxygen tanks and his inability to walk more than a block on a good day (or to walk at all on a bad day). It's as if he was being told he'd done nothing with his time, energy and patriotism when he was striving to literally give his last breath to fight.

Q put us to work on the information war lines - they were quite clear about it. I might be more persuadable if those who feel I advocate inactivity would at least acknowledge that a) there is a massively important information war going on and we are fighting in it under the leadership of Q/Q+ and b) many redpillers inside/outside the Q movement have sacrificied hours of their time with family and friends on a daily basis, during holidays, despite chronic debilitating illness etc. to 'man their posts' in the information war. If we stop 'manning our posts' the Deep State takes the ground we've gained and restores false reality to as many as possible. The information war is decisive - how could Trump lead anyone if we don't keep correcting the record of what he wants, says, does etc.

Bagster didn't hold a sign and stand outside the courthouse, as some valuable patriots did, but he contributed fiercely, tirelessly and with dedication; how is that 'doing nothing?' He stopped producing the Oracle long after the effort began significantly destroying his health; he perservered because he saw the need to unify our knowledge. 

Many peeps on this thread have confided the challenges they face (the range and size of the challenges are limitless) and yet they serve where and when they can, they are serving in the battle for humanity we're in. Because of people not at rallies right now, but at their keyboards, the White Hats are winnng the information war. Q and Q+ went out  of their way to  recruit for this ongoing information war because they have advanced knowledge of how important comms are to regaining our freedom.

There will be times when all who can will 'go public' and attend protests (i.e., 2nd amentment protest) and attend rallies etc.  But those who are online are serving the information war too.

My efforts at rallying interest to call senators/congress critters were not very successful. But I could see results when fighting pharma shills over Covid 'vaccines'. I go where I'm needed and I pray about that - what I should say, where I should spend my time, what thread resources are falling apart and need work etc. If you are, today, called to stand with those you list in person - I salute you. I do not urge you to stay with those whom you feel are inactive and relaxing over coffee.

When I first saw that Q was real, I was devastated that I coudln't see a means by which I could support the effort. But like others, I was led to ways that I could contribute. I don't rule out contributing in person at protests, but until I genuinely see where God would have me go, I continue to man my post.

To think that we can sit back and enjoy our coffee while our champion is threatened with prison and possible murder - well, as I say, not in the American Revolution.

Our champion has been threatened with prison and possible murder since he was elected. At that time I was asleep and when awakened in fall of 2017, I began to serve in the information war and have done so every since. Not soon enough? Not willing enough? Not long enough? Too selfish of me? Lingering over my coffee too long?

For the first 3 years I didn't want the role of MQD because based on my work experience and personality, I am best for research/analysis roles. But I couldn't find anyone to take my place, although I asked a few people, and eventually I perceived the need I was filling.

What is routinely missing from exasperated complaints, about perceived inactivity of our dedicated patriots volunteering in the information war, is any sort of strategy

What is your strategy, Bob? Please tell me where you feel protestors would do the most good and how you will join or rally them. We need numbers at protests - I'm not good at in-person recruiting and public speaking, but maybe you are. Or have you found a group or groups worth supporting? Then share the information about the groups so we can assess and update our knowledge and potential need for comfortable shoes with which to attend protests.

Just trying to shame those who aren't in protest lines right now doesn't cut it. We may ALL, to the best of our ability, serve time in protests or at rallies, collect signatures or funds for the effort, at various times but for now, I know my calling is in the information war, where at present, I can do the most good.

Perhaps your skill set as a communicator, organizer, motivator etc. is leading you to invest your efforts in the visible displays of support you might be referring to. Prayers up for your success in wherever you are called.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/26/2024 Vol.493, Q Day 2403, Snowybear wrote:

I admire your steadfastness. I am not as steadfast. I fully expect Trump will lose the appeal at the NY state level and it will have to be appealed at the federal level if not the SCOTUS. Will they try and steal the election again? You betcha! Will it work? It depends on the state. You are right. They are incredibly desperate. Even more so than in 2020. -SB

I do expect Trump would likely lose the appearl and it would have to go Federal, perhaps all the way to SCOTUS, because the civil courts REALLY aren't working at all levels. Right now, this farce just proves the NY federal court is not working. I guess as we go to vote with him appealing charges, they would still have the psyop value to refer to him as a dangrous 'convicted felon' etc. 

They are acting like they are horrified that they can't stop him. All this to keep him out of the election they plan to steal anyway? If they thought they could steal it, they could wait it out and drag him into court closer to the end zone if the need arose.

I don't feel that I am being steadfast 'despite the facts'. The facts I have been watching have not worsened but instead are 'getting better, faster.'  Control is shifting from dark to light. It's happening in a controlled way to maintain stability. The optics which overlay the battle can be so grim, but beneath it I continue to see 'winning'.

The longer the Deep State torments him, the more popular he gets. This would not have been true in 2016. I would say much of the public has been detached from key Deep State indoctrination shackles in a manner that, while painful, has been accepted better than I ever imagined possible.

As far as a red-pill cooking metaphor goes, those following Q early on were microwaved with doses of reality, and then collected seasoning with each passing day since then. Many who never heard of Q or thought it was fake, have been relentlessly slow roasted in red-pill sauce happening before their own eyes for years now, and much of it took place despite the 24/7 indoctrination that had been shaping our fake 'reality' for generations. "Sometimes you have to show" us, but once we see it for ourselves it's much harder to 'come and take it' from us.

We'll never be 'done' learning that it's worse than we knew, and the end is not for everyone, but I'm grateful to God we are this far along 'so soon'. I can't believe I feel this way now - I used to believe a limited number of key, important changes were occurring (could only occur) at a glacial rate. Now it can be hard to keep up with what little we are allowed to know (classified/media blackouts etc).

The deep state 'specialty' has long been 'demoralize, destabilize, and overthrow.' They trusted their grip on the public to make it impossible for Trump/Q/patriots to change the course of the ship of state without capsizing it. I am no historian but I can't think of a similar transformation in history accomplished at this velocity in such a short time. The Deep State did corrode our society, sometimes by  leaps and bounds, but I've never heard of unification and 'awakening' happening across socio-economic levels, age brackets, political parties, ethnicities, national boundaries etc. sufficient to pivot the course of a nation under full sail, while peacefully rejecting divisive assault after assault by state level actors world-wide.

That monumental miracle continues to gain speed.

The black hats seem increasingly desperate for money. President Trump's EO started draining Deep State resources and efforts like the EO seems to be deflating DS capacities. The Ukraine is a key source of money for the DNC's election theft among countless other crimes, and they are losing it (pun not intended, but accepted). That last money grab ($65 billion) didn't have room for the kind of skimming they are used to getting. Why not? They didn't think they could get it or someone said 'no'?

The Ukraine seems to be the Deep State's military (and spiritual) Pentagon. They expected Brandon to get the nuke football and therefore they expected massive control and swift victory. Now the Russians are taking village after village at an increasing rate, and according to Alexander Mercouris (Youtube), Russian forces taking regions are beginning to meet up with other Russian forces in nearby regions to form larger and larger assault forces, accelerating their progress.

I was trying to pin down key points in my reasoning when I say, the facts I watch are getting better. I don't seem to be able to do that well (or concisely) so I'll truncate my efforts here. *detects sighs of relief* Sorry this is so long -it's hard to selectively pull information I've integrated out from my world-view like this.

If the Brandon regime handlers ever managed to assasinate President Trump, they would find a much different, and far more unified citizen's response than they would have when encountered had they killed him when he first took office. Their plan was never to 'face' the enraged public but to walk the public into a narrowing funnel under hypnotic media indoctrination.  Despite the setbacks, the world is turning against them, instead of against the truth.

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/26/2024 Vol.493, Q Day 2403, Bob Ireland wrote:

ransomnote: Excerpting Bob Ireland's post.... Bob Ireland: Unhappily, I have lost confidence in elections. I know what happened in 2020 and anyone questioning that outcome has been labeled an insurrectionist by the corrupt DoJ. Look at Dems like Judge Juan Merchan and his daughter; with all their criminal excesses, don't you suppose that they have been told: 'Don't worry about breaking the law. 'We' will still be in power in January and from then on.' All Dems are pushing their destructive agenda without apology and thin lies. ransomenote: Personally I believe they are in panic mode. If your baby was dangling off the side of the upstairs balcony, you wouldn't care what impression you give others, or what you exposed, as you rushed outside wearing nothing to drag the family's air-filled bounce house to a place you hope will safely buffer baby's fall, because it really looks like baby is on the way down. I believe the Dems are willing to blow it ALL out the hatches because if they don't, they 'hang from nooses.' If the Deep Staters posture and prance and win - then they are 'covered' no matter what they said or say next. Or, they lose and these statements mean nothing compared with their treasonous attack on America they have been enacting over and over again. I  suppose people like Judge Merchan and his daughter have been told - say whatever you have to say, lie at will, beccause you will hang, and we will hang along with, you if you don't 'lie like the wind.' If the DNC expects to be in power in Jan, they sure are acting weird right now. Bob Ireland: The 'Rats seem totally unconcerned about the outcome of this election. I hope they are wrong and are caught with their pants down - but I have doubts; they don't❗ Today on Clay and Buck Trump's press spokesperson proclaimed clearly, "We are no longer living in a Constitutional Republic!" I completely concur❗ ransomnote: I agree, but I think we interpret his purpose differently. The public has to know the extent to which the Deep Staters have departed from the Constitution (treason). It's not just NY law, and not just politics, instead the kangaroo court violates the Constitution. His words signal, 'No need for soft arguments, they have committed blatant treason.' Bob Ireland: The Republicans could shut down Congress for a day in protest; lawyers and judges could shut down the legal system for a day to protest; small businesses could shut down for a day in protest. None of that is happening... NOTHING is happening. ransomnote: I believe the stuff that's happening is not what gets air time on Cnn, NBC etc. Stuff that's happening is on the MSM's 'blackout' list. Many on both sides of the aisle are 'controlled so I haven't been expecting the minority of the Republicans who are patriots to move mountains. They play a key role - they speak for the pubic and the pubic watches how their true representatives are treated, but they are at present too few to prevail. I suspect those lawyers and judges who 'shut down the legal system for a day' would no longer be employed by it within 4 hours of enacting their freeze. They would be falsely charged with insurrection (Q Shaman would be photoshopped into press pictures) - overthrow of the Constitution, court, justice, democracy etc. With their de-barring, or arrest/removal, the court would have even fewer honest lawyers, judges left. Bob Ireland: The Dems see clearly that they can get away with discarding the Constitution completely and escape consequences. They got away with it with Jan 06; they got away with it when they denied our right for a Senate trial for Alejandro Mayorkas - a world class liar and criminal; they got away with it with Anthony Fauci; they got away with it when they passed a law that it is a crime to demonstrate against abortion - and have prosecuted dear innocent family members and thrown them in prison. ransomnote:That's a key area of our disagreement in world views. I see them panicking because it's not over yet. They haven't permanently escaped Justice; Justice has been delayed for strategic purposes. Those delays are brutal (i.e., Jan 6ers in the gulag etc.) but vital for stratetic success. So I see Dems in fight/flight modes of panic, and you see them confident. I see delays I find frustrating, but it's CERTAINLY not over yet. The White Hats are working to 'Save the Baby' and they are winning. In fact, the good stuff is finally unrolling. Bob Ireland: Without the fear of consequences, and by threatening the judges who might stand up for what is right, the 'Rats are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams in overthrowing our Constitutional Republic❗💯 ransomnote: I saw frightened chickens waving Ukrainian flags in Congress, like a hummingbirds flapping their tiny wings, when the spending bill was approved. While they pretended they were saving the Ukraine, most of the money in that bill stayed in the us (i.e., they were saving themselves): basically the  $10 mill paid in US contractors' expenses and Ukrainian government salaries, pensions, and to buy obsolete military 'assets' for the Ukraine. The dems cheered 'freedom' to hide their desperation with their false portrayal of benevolence. They need money any way they can get it, and they just received a little of it. Bob Ireland: Until I see different, I agree with Trump's press secretary. As for elections. someone prove to me that a tyranny has ever been overturned by popular vote👈 Tyrants don't allow contrary popular elections. ransomnote: Again, I blieve Trump's press secretary was furthering the 'teachable moment' to prove civilian courts are not functioning. This is why Q once said, "the military is the only way." Fallen civilian courts owned by our enemies will not spontaneously revert to fair elections. Military tribunals and controls are now 'in season' for Summer. Within the first 3 days in Q dropping (2017), Q said the quiet part out loud. Only the Military can prosecute bad actors once agencies/judges (DOJ) are corrupt. Q17 We need to support those efforts by making it clear with our  own actions/posts that this is not a military overthrow. It would be so easy for them to frame us, as they frame Trump and J6-ers. for treason. Bob Ireland: The American people will HAVE to stand up and take control of their govt 💪 or stop all the whining. ransomnote: Brave, legitimate patriot heros, including Trump, did stand up and protest on Jan 6 - they weren't whining. Most of the protesters are still abused in jail. Biden wants us to protest so he can call it another violent threat to democracy and strip us of the right to assembly, free speech, 2nd amendment by claiming MAGA is laboring to overthrow the country. "Tactics, Mr. Ryan." I see Trump's plan working - it's amazing.

Reuters Trawls Right-wing Comments Sections to Claim ‘Trump Supporters’ Want ‘Riots’
Breitbart ^

Posted on 5/31/2024, 1:12:18 PM by Tench_Coxe

Reuters published a story on Friday claiming that supporters of former President Donald Trump are calling for “riots” and “violent retribution” after Thursday’s verdict in New York convicting him on 34 counts in a trial seen as unfair.

(snip)

Reuters did not confirm that the comments were made by actual Trump supporters. Nor did it quote what actual, verifiable Trump supporters were saying in public, or what Trump-backing elected officials have said and done.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

ransomnote:

I recall the 'old days' when FR was unavailable due to Denial of Service attacks. I don't have the seniority that many have here, but it seemed to happen most around the Monica Lewinsky days. I don't know if we've had a single offline instance since FR migrated to a different server farm.

I'm grateful that Jim Rob and family have kept us online so well even during the Biden regime, during the plandemic, the 'vaccine' rollout, the Trump trials....etc. when we were sharing otherwise forbidden information. I'm grateful to God that we have been given a place to post and an independent platform, and we were given these blessings back when Q was just a controversial rumor.

Hellooooo from FESTIVAL!!!!!!!!!!!

Thought you might like to see this. It fits the Trump trial verdict to a T!

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/26/2024 Vol.493, Q Day 2403, RitaOK wrote:

Flagging for moderation watch if Admin deems appropriate. We all know how back and forth, applause and escalation begins.

Yes. It begins spontaneously after you ridicule us and I ask you to stop.

I sent no emails hinting/asking for support; I don't do that. (I used to email bagster begging him to stay off of forum threads and out of trouble).

After my first response to you, I replied to two on-thread solidarity posts via private email with thanks to show appreciation without escalating the thread.  I spontaneously received and replied to emails from 2 other FReeQs which again were solidarity comments and thanks. I respond in private because I prefer to avoid on thread disruption or escalation.

Oh and when bagster accepted someone's challenge to a fight by posting his address and name online, I asked admin to remove it. Later he asked, "Did you ask admin to..." and I interrupted with "YES!" to which he responded, "WHY!?!?!"

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 05/26/2024 Vol.493, Q Day 2403, RitaOK wrote:

RitaOK wrote: A Pacifist speaks— in shrill. ransomnote wrote: If I were a pacifist I would stand back and watch you ridicule us, distort what we do here, and grind down morale without comment. If I were truly a pacifist I would not volunteer in the information war for years, the way Trump and Q requested of us. Trump did not intervene in the riots the way the Deep State hoped; yet Trump is a fighter, not a pacifist. Trump (and Q) are strategists. There's nothing about him (or them) or us for that matter, that is passive. All of us who volunteer our days red-pilling, being ridicule by trolls, and researching this grim information did not sit back and just heap contempt upon others and 'just type' like you do. RitaOK wrote: Your manner and name calling is always over the top, in a too long commanding screed that would disgust the patriots who fought and died over a tea tax! What names would you have called them? ransomnote: You began this exchange by ridiculing us as as 'Q-balls,' sneering once again that we're failures. You hold yourself high above us and dump on us as if we don't measure up to your 'standards' while you yourself do nothing. And yet you object to name calling? Those of us who support Trump's plan disgust you but you just won't keep it to yourself or go post with people with whom you agree. I responded by addressing your heckling today with the name you previously earned for yourself by elevating yourself above us while  heckling us as lazy, lumbering failures, all while never lifting a finger to do anything yourself. BREAKING NEWS: Our Commander in Chief is working a different strategy  than the one(s) employed by the heroes of the Revolutionary War. Biden wants protests he can distort as insurrection by panicked MAGA fighting to 'save Trump,' because Brandon wants to shut down MAGA, rallies, protests, public gatherings, Q movement participants and online communities by claiming they are 'dangerous to democracy'. That would ensure mail in ballots and potentially Martial Law. But look who I'm telling this to, right? You of course are advocating for actions to trigger Brandon's toxic playbook; it's why you're here...'just typing'. RitaOK wrote: Your directives always have included a sitting position. Shut-up and write checks for sure, and probably mail your ballot in? You have no room for activists, but for demanding to purview their resume of action. ransomnote: You heckle us with your loud hypocrisy and then demean years of our information war efforts to mere 'shut up and write checks' and 'mail your ballot in' - neither of which are actions I or others have ever encouraged on this thread. You had no valid complaints about us so you just made them up. You lied about us, again. RitaOK wrote:  You may Sit Down or hug a tree.. I will work through my own issues with today’s events ransomnote: I don't care whether you work through your 'issues' or not.  Just stop ridiculing us for supporting Trump's strategy and the Q movement. It's what we do here. We're almost at 500 threads - you know what we represent by this point. Harrassing us doesn't work. By now, you're just heckling us like the liar, infiltrator, troll that you are. If the information war was 'just typing' as you  said it was, then you're a failure to remain here typing for years, pretending to blend in for awhile before resuming your heckling and ridicule 'recruitment' efforts. Let's see if you continue to 'waste your time doing nothing' but 'just typing' while ridiculing Q thread information warriors you despise. Likely you'll do so sitting down. Your actions expose you, Rita.  You don't believe what you say - you're just here to dismantle morale and this thread along with it. Every day we're still here and you're 'just typing' on this thread, you're a failure by your own standards. Stop ridiculing us, Rita.