Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLAGRAYFOX

I think Heyward will "resign to spend more time with his family" at the appropriate time. But Moonves is too busy a guy to have individual producers reporting directly to him. He's already fired everybody else between him and the grunts, so he needs Heyward to stay there until they can re-populate the place.

Personally, I think that's a mistake if Heyward is in fact not going to remain; new people coming in have a right to know who their boss is going to be... that's a big part of choosing a job. But maybe the "new team" is being assembled off to the side, and everybody will flip at once, including Rather. If they have to buy people out of contracts at other places in order to get them, March is not an unreasonable timeframe for making the switch. It takes time to "paper" all the contracts and deals.


38 posted on 01/13/2005 7:22:56 PM PST by Nick Danger (The only way out is through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Nick Danger

Actually, I agree with you. My own personal belief is that Viacom fired Dan Rather and told him to take a hike in March, 2005. Rather has destroyed himself and has really hurt the NEWS division. You are right, the wheels of corporate America spin rather slowly. This story is not over yet. Many knives from all sides are out looking to do in the disgraced and failed Dan Rather.


45 posted on 01/13/2005 7:48:32 PM PST by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson