Not until she modifies her views on abortion, she won't!
Time for a Chaney - Condi job swop.
You have to consider the package. The president swears to oppose all enemies, foreign and domestic, and is responsible constitutionally to provide for the common defense, to promote the general welfare and to secure the blessings of liberty on ourselves and our posterity.
I'd say Rice has it all over the hildabeast in all these areas.
The Supremes will decide the abortion issue, not the president.
She's said repeatedly that she's not running, and I believe her. But if she did, here's a wild card suggestion. She could acknowledge that she's pro-choice -- but then insist, as a pro-choice, socially moderate, judicial conservative, that Roe was wrongly decided (the Krauthamer position). She could then pledge to nominate Scalia-Alito type judges, placing her rhetorical emphasis on the many issues other than abortion at stake in the constitutional debate.
Rudy Giuliani could do the same thing. That might scramble the deck.
You are correct!
She is pro-choice and so is McCain.
Neither of them could get the majority of the base who are anti-abortion.