Posted on 11/16/2006 7:30:34 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe
HANOI, Vietnam (AP) President Bush has arrived in Vietnam.
Ummm.... who?
I'm very proud about my nation. That is Vietnam is set to become the WTO's 150th member following a desicion by the General Council on 7 November 2006, and now at Hanoi capital, from 12th to 19th Nov, hosts the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Leaders Meeting Week and the visiting of President W.Bush to Vietnam. Vietnam will improve in future."
I say good for the Vietnamese people! If they think the future will be brighter, good for them! What a shame that nations like Cuba and North Korea are not moving in this direction. What a shame that no matter how hard you try you will never find a Cuban or a North Korean online. They are kept in the dark...decades behind the rest of the world. And how nice to have a foreignor refer to our leader with the respect of calling him President and not "Mr." or worse like you hear coming from Canada and Europe these days.
.
November 16, 2006 =
President BUSH lands in Communist Vietnam
November 16, 1965 =
Our U.S. 7th Cavalry's Day of Victory in the Valley of Death known as the IA DRANG Valley of a then Free South Vietnam.
http://www.lzxray.com
http://www.RickRescorla.com
.
From a metaphorical point of view we all arrived in Vietnam last Tuesday....
GWB in Vietnam? What, he couldn't enlist in the Alabama National Guard and avoid being sent there? /sarc (figured I'd say it before someone else). You know the LSM would.
Could this moment had been achieved without the destruction and death of the Vietnam war?
That's a good question. Something tells me... maybe not. I mean, if we did not go there, how many other countries may have fallen to communism in the region? Or even in our own region
I have been told by some who live there (under 30 years old) that if the US did not leave when it did, Saigon would have been more advanced than Hong Kong today.
That makes sense. They're probably still flying F-102s.
Went to sights. Thank you for your service and all your posts . Your almost as good as TONKIN. (smile)
Exactly. I'm tired of the double-standard revisionists here.
I refuse to go to Hanoi and anywhere in China.
Though I do believe they are "communist in name only" as another poster mentioned and though it's mostly symbolic since it's now all one nation, I would never go to Hanoi or any part of the fomer North. That's where I drew the line. The Vietnamese government would have to publically denounce their communist system and adopt a totally free democratic system before I would ever go there.
Even while in Saigon I made it a point never to buy souvenirs from places I suspected were government run shops like the ones you would find in tourist attractions or the post office. I always made a point of buying them from the people selling them in the streets.
I would never go to China for the same reason I will not go to Venezuela and the same reason I dont think Americans should go to Cuba. I dont want my money going to supporting such a regime. I only wished we could avoid the chinese imports...but that's another issue.
Yes, it was a good talk
The old formula at work.
MaineVoter2002 said: The Vietnamese government would have to publically denounce their communist system and adopt a totally free democratic system before I would ever go there. (ok, I can't figure out how to put this in italics).
Be patient. I give it 20 years max before Vietnam will be a democracy. But the public denouncement of communism will never happen. They will at some point within the next 20 years "honor the communist contribution" to Vietnam and send communism off to a peaceful retirement.
Just my prediction, based on my own experiences in Vietnam (yes, more anecdotes)
If I recall, while reading my history textbook in the 10th grade, I don't know if it is instantly verifiable or not but after WWI, there was a guy who complained in front of Woodrow Wilson, Lloyd George and others about his nation, Vietnam, being a colony and not independent or something in that regard. That man's name was Ho Chi Minh.
I only recited a good amount from memory, I can't remember the exact story, but whether it be true or not it was in my textbook and so it would be interesting to hear your response on that.
Karl Rove stuned your beeber.
"Kerry was in Vietnam? What side was he on?"
The "back" side, when he shot and killed that boy and got a medal.
Kerry served in Vietnam??? I did not know that!
"Ho Chi Minh"
There are some compelling stories about Bac Ho (e.g., his references to the US Constitution and to Abraham Lincoln), but here's the one that is most important, IMO:
Ho Chi Minh was *co-founder* in the 1920's of the **French** (yes, French) Communist Party and later, founder of the Communist Party Of Indochina.
His ideology was a bit more than simple Vietnamese nationalism.
You're right, the United States didn't lose in Vietnam; it abandoned the South Vietnamese. Kissinger negotiated a cease fire, then instead of supporting a free South, Congress cut funding. Sure enough, the Communists took over and commited mass murder. Saigon became Ho Chi Minh City. The Democrats and other liberal luntics want to repeat this crime in Iraq, thereby wasting the lives and limbs of our soldiers who have sacrificed. Someday the politicians will call on Americans to fight for freedom, and nobody will bother to show up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.