To: Lunatic Fringe
Now Kerry can't say that George was never in Vietnam !
2 posted on
11/16/2006 7:32:37 PM PST by
llevrok
(You can't plant the seed of freedom by pulling out early !)
To: llevrok
It wouldn't take much for Bush to be there LONGER than carry was....LOL
3 posted on
11/16/2006 7:34:22 PM PST by
Txsleuth
To: llevrok
I'm not sure that a good thing.
To: llevrok
I'm not sure that a good thing.
To: llevrok
I'm not sure that a good thing.
To: llevrok
Sorry, I only pressed the button once. I swear :o)
To: All; llevrok; Lunatic Fringe; Txsleuth; GodGunsGuts; angkor
25 posted on
11/16/2006 7:48:34 PM PST by
ALOHA RONNIE
("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com.)
To: llevrok
But kerry can say President Bush didn't spend Christmas in Cambodia and have IT SEARED IN HIS MEMORY. lol
26 posted on
11/16/2006 7:48:35 PM PST by
tillacum
To: llevrok
And George arrived to Vietnam as President of the United States, which Kerry will never get to say about himself.
Extra salt in the gold digging gigolo traitors wounds.
35 posted on
11/16/2006 7:58:59 PM PST by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: llevrok
Call me when Nixon sends Bush to Cambodia on Christmas Eve.
42 posted on
11/16/2006 8:06:00 PM PST by
beans36
("I know what you're thinking. 'Did he sell six properties or only five?'" - Dirty Harry Reid)
To: llevrok
106 posted on
11/17/2006 7:15:01 AM PST by
Finalapproach29er
(Dems will impeach Bush if given a chance.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson