1 posted on
02/26/2007 6:50:37 PM PST by
mdittmar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: mdittmar
"Democrats back away from Iraq plan" Translation: Democrats cut and run.
2 posted on
02/26/2007 6:51:58 PM PST by
Enterprise
(Drop pork bombs on the Islamofascist wankers. Praise the Lord and pass the hammunition.)
To: mdittmar
Is there anything Dems don't eventually back away from?
3 posted on
02/26/2007 6:52:11 PM PST by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: mdittmar
This will not sit well with the moonbats.
4 posted on
02/26/2007 6:52:23 PM PST by
popdonnelly
([Democrats] are jubilant at our disasters and are cast down when the rebels are defeated -Sept. 1862)
To: mdittmar
This is good.
They could have done real damage. Sure it would have made them look stupid but the safety of our our troops and not giving comfort to the enemy outweighs any political gain the Republicans might have had if the Dems over-reached.
5 posted on
02/26/2007 6:53:39 PM PST by
gondramB
(It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
To: mdittmar
6 posted on
02/26/2007 6:54:02 PM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: mdittmar
Dingy Harry was afraid Leiberman was going to put him into the minority.
8 posted on
02/26/2007 6:55:47 PM PST by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: mdittmar
"The public is saying, 'We hired you to get out of Iraq now figure it out'" The public hired you because the media successfully portrayed the Republican Party as Jack Abramoff's merry band of kiddie diddlers. But you go on and keep believing your charge to keep is to lose the Iraq war. More power to ya'.
To: mdittmar
Is it possible that the apparent success of the surge and new rules of engagement has those who can think more than a week into the future pondering how they would look a year from now if they officially back the democrat plan?
10 posted on
02/26/2007 6:58:38 PM PST by
RobRoy
To: mdittmar
It should be noted somewhere, though probably not in an MSM report, that all of the recommendations of the 911 commission that made any sense were immediately implemented. What the Dems actually want to do is enact the small remaining percentage of those recommendations. Once again, the Dems efforts to rewrite history are being enabled by a reporter.
To: mdittmar
Everyone that believes Reid and the Dems raise your hands
15 posted on
02/26/2007 7:04:24 PM PST by
Mo1
( http://www.gohunter08.com)
To: mdittmar
'We hired you to get out of Iraq now figure it out,'" said Tom Matzzie, Washington director of the anti-war group MoveOn.org. "There is a risk that without action, frustration boils over into anger."IOW, "Do what we anti-American liberals want or we'll start smashing things!"
What a bunch of spoiled punks!
17 posted on
02/26/2007 7:04:51 PM PST by
airborne
(Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
To: mdittmar
No guts. Won't they make a stand on anything? If you want to support the troops by bringing them home, put forward legislation to bring them home tomorrow. If Bush lied and people died then impeach him. They wriggle and squirm like worms. No wonder terrorists think they can attack us.
To: mdittmar
Please spread the word about an appeal for redress that people in the military can sign to show support for the mission:
www.appealforcourage.org
20 posted on
02/26/2007 7:07:17 PM PST by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! If you are military please sign at: appealforcourage.org)
To: mdittmar
21 posted on
02/26/2007 7:07:56 PM PST by
do the dhue
(DEM ARE RATS!!!!!)
To: mdittmar
We'll call it repositioning ;-)
22 posted on
02/26/2007 7:08:01 PM PST by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! If you are military please sign at: appealforcourage.org)
To: mdittmar
I thought this was the sole reason why they were elected. Their constituents aren't going to be very happy.
24 posted on
02/26/2007 7:09:01 PM PST by
umgud
(I did not sleep with Anna Nicole)
To: mdittmar
they were for it... before they were against it!!!
26 posted on
02/26/2007 7:14:31 PM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: mdittmar
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., meanwhile, said she doesn't support tying war funding to strict training and readiness targets for U.S. troops. Don't they understand that is a Constitutional issue, or do they just not care?
27 posted on
02/26/2007 7:14:50 PM PST by
Cogadh na Sith
(There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
To: mdittmar
To: mdittmar
Democrats cut and run from their cut and run plan.
31 posted on
02/26/2007 7:22:04 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Veritas. Gravitas. Ohmygas.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson