Dianne Swine-stein can bitch all she wants about Pakistan. The fact of the matter is that the leader of that government is cooperating with us to a realistic extent in getting rid of terrorists.
The leaders of the Democrat party are NOT cooperating with our Commander in Chief in an effort to get rid of Al-Qaida in Iraq or America!
They've opposed the war in Iraq and they've opposed the Patriot Act (remember Hairy Reed happily saying "We killed the Patriot Act"?. Iraq to some degree AND the Patriot Act to a greater degree were efforts to thwart Al-Qaida and like-minded groups...AND DEMOCRATS OPPOSED BUSH'S EFFORTS TO STOP AL-QAIDA.
In fact, the ONLY real effort Democrats backed fully was the war in Afghanistan. And yet these DOLTS fail to realize that Iraq will be Afghanistan II if we don't support freedom there.
Democrats are idiots, pure and simple. Swine-stein's words only show the extent to which Democrats blame everyone else but fail to change themselves. They are TRUE narcissists.
Hell, even President Bush has been willing to change tactics and strategies--but the liberals continue to point outward, in a sickeningly self-righteous way.
To think I used to be one of them...it makes me shudder.
******************8EXCERPT**********************
WASHINGTON — Just hours after floating the idea of cutting $20 billion from President Bush's $142 billion request for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan next year, Senate Budget Committee Chairman was overruled by fellow Democrats Thursday.
"It's nothing that any of us are considering," Senate Majority Leader , D-Nev., told reporters.
Conrad's trial balloon to cut war funding would have affected the budget year beginning Oct. 1 and was separate from the ongoing debate over Bush's $100 billion request for immediate supplemental funding for and .
Even the Pentagon acknowledges that its $142 billion 2008 war funding request is simply a best guess of Iraq and Afghanistan costs, and Conrad's proposal didn't earn rebukes from Budget Committee Republicans.
But the speed with which it was rejected by his colleagues seemed to reflect Democrats' sensitivity to any accusations of giving shortshrift treatment to funding for troops in battle.
"Our caucus feels strongly that we should go with the president's numbers" on 2008 war costs, Conrad said. He spoke just hours after floating the idea of curbing Bush's request for next year's war budget.