[AU72]

Concession!? How about funding our troops you collective POSs!

[Paradox]

Is it just me, or does anyone else have the feeling that this is something of a dog and pony show, from BOTH sides. Both sides are benifiting here, the Dems get to placate their base, and the President gets to use the "Good cop, Bad cop" routine on the Iraqi leadership ("clean up your own house, b*tches")... It all just seems rather contrived.

To be honest, having gone to DC several times for business, and having rubbed elbows with folks in Government, I'd say that most of that cr*p is contrived..

[pabianice]

Another SFGate pantload. SHOULD read, “Soros-funded, American-hating, treasonous lunatic leftists showed little appetite for compromise Wednesday, hours ahead of a session aimed at funding our troops in Iraq...”

[Piquaboy]

Bush may as well go talk to a post as talk to those idiots. They hate him and any compromising is beyond them.

[savedbygrace]

A bill that actually does anything more than fund the troops will be vetoed, and the Dims will not be able to over-ride the veto. The President might let them throw in some non-binding language that’s in agreement with previously established administration goals, but that’s it.

So, what’s to compromise?

[Coldwater Creek]

I thought that the Dems were going to jam the bill down the President’s throat???

[KeyLargo]

Freep this POLL.

Do you support Bush’s veto of the Iraq spending bill?

http://www.nbc5.com/index.html

Scroll down right side of page.