Replies

1 posted on 05/08/2007 7:07:40 PM PDT by Jean S

...the Democratic Congress will challenge the president’s non-enforcement of the laws.

Starting with immigration laws?

211 posted on 05/09/2007 2:30:24 PM PDT by kc8ukw

Fine, Nancy. Take the President to court. Politics is more important than defending the country, right?

213 posted on 05/09/2007 2:57:52 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)

They (and the people who vote for them) want us to lose.

214 posted on 05/09/2007 2:59:04 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)

"Pelosi recently told a group of liberal bloggers, “We can take the president to court”..."

"Uh, No."

216 posted on 05/09/2007 4:23:34 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)

"You are so sued! Sue you!"

220 posted on 05/09/2007 6:21:57 PM PDT by SkyPilot

The Dems will have to eat crow on this initiative to cut funding, or our President will be vetoing much of the Dem legislation coming his way. The Dems are abandonong the legislation of other bills, and will go down as a lame duck congress accomplishing nothing.

The Dems do not have the majority necessary for an overide of a veto, and need to stop acting as if they do.Perhaps the think they can turn enough Republicans in the House and Senate to overide on one of their despicable bills.

I think they are finding that not enouugh Pubbies will turn, because those who did would be pilloried as traitors to the cause, and traitors to our troops in foreign lands.

President Bush is moarlly right in his resolve, and he is strategically correct. The Dems simly wish to prevent a sucess in Iraq, which they know to be NOW developing, which has hastened their game, and added a sense of desperation to it, of threatening a court action and impeachment proceeedings.

Them Dems face an unblinking President, and will continue hopefully to face an unblinking Republican party.

Where will the President get funding for Iraq? I believe he will start emergency closing down of those programs which Dems value the most, such as NPR and others.

221 posted on 05/09/2007 7:25:59 PM PDT by Candor7

Pure idiocy. How about suing UBL? They’d rather do that than spend another cent on the WOT.

229 posted on 05/11/2007 8:23:56 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)

interesting. Is Nancy Pelosi now the president?

231 posted on 05/11/2007 2:24:23 PM PDT by realcleanguy

SUE? Apparently she did not pay attention in her civics class and know that the President can veto any law he sees fit. It is called checks and balances.

235 posted on 05/12/2007 8:10:29 PM PDT by lndrvr1972

Why didn’t Bush declare war, instead of creating the situation we face now with Pelosi pulling such stunt?

238 posted on 05/12/2007 9:47:47 PM PDT by Francis

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794