Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historic month passes without any U.S. fatalities in Iraq - the first since 2003 invasion
Daily Mail ^ | 5:06 PM on 1st September 2011 | David Gardner

Posted on 09/01/2011 3:54:06 PM PDT by Pan_Yan

For the first time since America invaded Iraq in 2003, an entire month has passed without any US troops being killed.

The sobering milestone came after 14 US soldiers died in Iraq in July, making it the most deadly month for Americans in three years.

It also came during a return of sectarian fighting in August that left 155 civilians dead amid a campaign of suicide bombings and cold- blooded assassinations.

American military chiefs attribute the drop in deaths to the Iraqi government finally pushing back against the Iran-backed militias.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; wot
I pray this trend continues, and that we can achieve the same thing in Afghanistan.
1 posted on 09/01/2011 3:54:13 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Bush’s fault.


2 posted on 09/01/2011 3:55:08 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Well, I’m gonna say it. IT’S ALL BUSH’S FAULT.


3 posted on 09/01/2011 3:55:20 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Does THE MAIL not think it just as historic to report that in the same month the US suffered the most fatalities in Afghanistan since the war began? Curiouser and curiouser the power of the press to inform and deceive at the same time.


4 posted on 09/01/2011 4:03:47 PM PDT by Binstence (Live Freep or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Re: Historic month passes without any U.S. fatalities in Iraq - the first since 2003 invasion!!

When will these Fuc#in liberals get it straight. We DID NOT INVADE IRAQ. We LIBERATED IRAQ!! OIF VET


5 posted on 09/01/2011 4:23:32 PM PDT by jesseam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jesseam
From the book Shadow Warriors by Kenneth R. Timmerman:

Bremer was a creature of the State Department and aspired to become secretary of state or national security advisor after his mission in Iraq, senior administration officials told me. His worldview regarding Iraq was in stark contrast to his political bosses. He told his wife, Francie, when he was first offered the job in Baghdad, that he was going to be "running the occupation of Iraq."

But neither Rumsfeld, Cheney nor Bush had ever talked about occupying Iraq. They talked about liberating Iraq. Bremer kept these views to himself until it was too late.

We can argue over semantics, but we invaded Iraq and at least at first ran it like an occupation. The end result may be liberation, but it was still an invasion.

6 posted on 09/01/2011 4:40:42 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Can we get the hell out of that turd world nation yet?


7 posted on 09/01/2011 5:39:45 PM PDT by KantianBurke (Where was the Tea Party when Dubya was spending like a drunken sailor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Keep holding it in, guys.


8 posted on 09/01/2011 6:02:36 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson