Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham predicts Supreme Court will send Trump presidential immunity case to lower courts
The Hill ^ | 04/28/2024 | Lauren Sforza

Posted on 04/28/2024 2:01:46 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) predicted Sunday that the Supreme Court will send former President Trump’s immunity case back to the lower courts.

“Well, I think the court’s gonna find that presidential immunity exists for President Trump like every other president, but you got to be within the scope of being president. I think they’ll send it back to the lower courts to find out exactly what actions fall within presidential immunity and what are considered personal. I think that’s the way this will end — there will be some immunity for some of the actions,” Graham said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: backstabber; deepstate; flimsygrahamnesty; gopestablishment; graham; grahamnesty; homosexualagenda; laurensforza; lindagraham; mediawingofthednc; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; predicts; presstitutes; rino; rinos; scotus; sidebarabuse; smearmachine; supremecourt; tds; thehill; theshill; trump; uniparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Linda is Karnak the Great now
1 posted on 04/28/2024 2:01:46 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Has this guy been right about anything?


2 posted on 04/28/2024 2:04:56 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
“Well, I think the court’s gonna find that presidential immunity exists for President Trump like every other president, but you got to be within the scope of being president.

So a President has immunity for his Presidential actions until he is out of office?

Obama is out of office. He committed lots of actual crimes, the first being his "birth certficate." When can we go after him.

3 posted on 04/28/2024 2:07:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

He’s a corrupt tool and often wrong, but he’s basically citing the consensus view among rational court observers here.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-v-u-s-supreme-court-jack-smith-michael-dreeben-333fddb2


4 posted on 04/28/2024 2:08:59 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
LOL, He thinks Roberts will punt.

He might be right about that.

5 posted on 04/28/2024 2:10:42 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Huh? I think that is the general opinion of almost every Constitutional legal professor that is not totally biased to the left. I don’t think the Democrats are going to get Trump to trial on any of the Fed cases before November.

Democrats should have filed these cases sooner but they waited until what they thought was prime time to have Trump convicted in late summer or early fall. They assumed all the judges along the way would fall in line with them, SCOTUS wouldn’t get involved, and it would be a slam dunk. That’s just not happening (See the Florida case for another example).


6 posted on 04/28/2024 2:12:08 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Lindsey........SHUT UP.


7 posted on 04/28/2024 2:13:32 PM PDT by alstewartfan (Child slavery, rape and drug OD's mean nothing to Roberts and Barrett. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Why does anybody care what the little turncoat faggot Linda has to say?

Hey SC, how about ditching this little b!tch?


8 posted on 04/28/2024 2:13:51 PM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Little to nothing but he may actually be right about this one.

Seems to me SCOTUS wants to narrow down and define just what constitutes a "presidential act" and a "personal act" while in office. JMO.

9 posted on 04/28/2024 2:15:18 PM PDT by Al B. ("Evil is powerless if the good are unafraid." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

Little Linda’s got her own jet airplane...
Little Linda is a millionaire...


10 posted on 04/28/2024 2:21:21 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (Just Give Me Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

Little Linda’s got her own jet airplane...
Little Linda is a millionaire...


11 posted on 04/28/2024 2:21:23 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (Just Give Me Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

The impression I got, the Supreme Court hinted that that is what they’re going to do.


12 posted on 04/28/2024 2:25:55 PM PDT by roving (Deplorable Listless Vessel Trumpist With Trumpitis and a Rainbow Bully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

LOL. Money for betraying and little boys for free. Come on, South Carolina: don’t you deserve better than a corrupt and compromised closet case?


13 posted on 04/28/2024 2:27:25 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (We can never stop failing for the minute we do, we fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I don’t understand the point of the S.C sending anything back to the lower courts, it made it to the top court now MAKE A DESCISION.


14 posted on 04/28/2024 2:31:10 PM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

It sounds like the way the court conservatives were going is the decision will be more definitive than that and hold any decision he makes as to carrying out his official duties whether motivation is policy or political is immune and his motivation is not material, even if it has to do with contesting an election and employing tactics that will benefit him as long as the tactics are legal, regardless of how one feels about the ethics. That pretty much leaves Smith with the ridiculous count that Trump led an insurrection with a guy in Viking horns as his general in raiding the Capitol to overthrow Congress and the government. Good luck with that. This also leaved Foni Fani’s Georgia case in jeopardy


15 posted on 04/28/2024 2:32:42 PM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

WTF does she know???


16 posted on 04/28/2024 2:34:48 PM PDT by wetgundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“...but you got to be within the scope of being president.”

That is what Trump’s lawyers are arguing.

How can a person maintain the right to presidential immunity if he has never been president?

The Supreme Court will not send the case back to lower courts since they would have to face the same case again.


17 posted on 04/28/2024 2:37:52 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

(Why does anybody care what the little turncoat faggot Linda has to say?)

Because he’s dangerous to the MAGA movement. He singlehandedly torpedoed the red wave in the 2022 midterms by calling for a national ban on abortion causing droves of women to vote Democrat.


18 posted on 04/28/2024 2:39:12 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The Supremes need to get an backbone and end this crap once and for all. They know this effort is completely corrupt. Shut this crap down.
Someday if a president strangles his wife on the front lawn, address such an event at that time.

Every time they pass on a strong stand, they encourage more of this bullshit. And a case involving a president should be handled AT the Supreme Court, not some lower judge where 3/4 of them are foreign born in dealing with Trump.
It’s literally what the Supreme Court was designed for.


19 posted on 04/28/2024 2:40:10 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Hope they don’t send it back to the same kangaroo courts whose bias triggered the original case.


20 posted on 04/28/2024 2:40:16 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson