Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
> ...But all these samples were very old - more than three billion years in age. The Mons Rümker materials, on the other hand, promise to be no more than 1.2 or 1.3 billion years old....

Are they sure these new-fangled samples will be fully ripened? 1.2 billion years, seems like just a blink of the eye.

The Eye of God, that is...

5 posted on 12/01/2020 9:08:57 PM PST by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government."`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
Are they sure these new-fangled samples will be fully ripened?

I can just see the lead scientist now, sampling a pinch of the Mons Rümker regolith, wrinkling his nose, and smugly intoning, "It's an impudent little vintage from the Copernican Period, lacking the maturity and balance of samples from the Late Heavy Bombardment."

Regards,

8 posted on 12/01/2020 9:21:19 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson