[Sir_Humphrey]

O’Feefe’s credibility is a mixed bag. A lot of times he’s wrong and has got caught taking things out of context. Still, a few times he’s been right so I’m not going to dismiss this out of hand. But if he’s going to make this claim, he has to specify what information was withheld

[Triple]

OMG is by far the best investigative journalism in the USA.

I challenge you to name a better investigative journalism outfit.

[hopespringseternal]

Bovine excrement. I have never seen a case where he is taking anything out of context. He is just good at winding up thuggish bad actors and getting them to brag about their skulduggery. They may overstate their own roles but they are pretty spot-on with the what was going on and why.

In so many cases with Trump, government officials just blindly and uncritically followed the groupthink. Trump did a horrible job picking leaders. He got a collection of wannabe alphas who were just butch beta compliance enforcers.

And the compliance they were enforcing was uniformly anti-Trump.

[Eagles6]

When has he been wrong?

[reasonisfaith]

O’Keefe has to specify to you, but you don’t have to specify to us?

[Antoninus]

O’Feefe’s credibility is a mixed bag.

Right. He's one of the few people out there still doing actual investigative journalism, and yet his credibility is suspect? OK.

Did you actually watch the video? You should. It's pretty damning. If the bureaucracy is withholding information from the elected officials -- you know, the ones who are supposed to make the decisions -- seems to me that would be an offense worthy of some sort of really serious punishment. Failing that, it becomes even more obvious that the elected officials are NOT in charge.

Think about the implications of that.