Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay Apologizes for Schiavo Case Rhetoric
AP via Yahoo ^ | April 13, 2005 | Terence Hunt

Posted on 04/13/2005 8:21:32 PM PDT by cyncooper

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay apologized Wednesday for using overheated rhetoric on the day Terri Schiavo died, but refused to say whether he supports impeachment of the judges who ruled in her case.

~snip~

At a crowded news conference in his Capitol office, DeLay addressed remarks he made in the hours after the brain-damaged Florida woman died on March 31. "I said something in an inartful way and I shouldn't have said it that way and I apologize for saying it that way," DeLay told reporters.

~snip~

DeLay seemed at pains to soften, if slightly, his rhetoric of March 31, when Schiavo died despite an extraordinary political and legal effort to save her life.

"I believe in an independent judiciary. I repeat, of course I believe in an independent judiciary," DeLay said.

At the same time, he added, the Constitution gives Congress power to oversee the courts.

"We set up the courts. We can unset the courts. We have the power of the purse," DeLay said.

Asked whether he favors impeachment for any of the judges in the Schiavo case, he did not answer directly.

Instead, he referred reporters to an earlier request he made to the House Judiciary Committee to look into "judicial activism" and Schiavo's case in particular.

~snip~

(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: apology; cowardaceunderfire; delay; grovelingissafer; schiavo; thewormturns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,021-1,034 next last
To: demlosers

Chief Justice John Marshall, wrote during impeachment proceedings against Justice Samuel Chase for his arbitrary use of judicial power that "a Judge giving a legal opinion contrary to the opinion of the legislature is liable to impeachment."


181 posted on 04/13/2005 10:31:08 PM PDT by daybreakcoming ("Courage is being scared to death -- and saddling up anyway." - John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor
Nobody did anything to anyone in cold, hot or luke warm blood.

Greer adjudicated this case more than properly. He followed the law in this case to the smallest detail. Anything to the contrary is just a false accusation and not worthy of further argument.
182 posted on 04/13/2005 10:31:35 PM PDT by Cold Heat (This is not sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest

lol


183 posted on 04/13/2005 10:32:15 PM PDT by Sun (Visit www.theEmpireJournal.com * Pray for Terri. Pray to end abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
No.

That's your opinion. I have a different opinion.

184 posted on 04/13/2005 10:32:33 PM PDT by Freedom Dignity n Honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: lula

Yes.


185 posted on 04/13/2005 10:32:40 PM PDT by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Liberals shout with glee, "We got another conservative to apologize".


186 posted on 04/13/2005 10:33:30 PM PDT by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor

No, I don't, you published some bizzare screed about martians and nazis and not meaning 'you' and all kinds of bs. Hey, if you want to come out and call me a nazi in a direct way, go ahead and do it, you have done so many times in a very indirect and flawed way.

Can you argue anything on this issue without having to resort to failed emotional rhetoric, allusions to Nazis or calling someone a murderer?

I don't think so, I don't think you have maturity and intellectual prowess to proceed in an argument on this, I'd laugh at your foolish attempts, but I will be kind.

Next time you wish to call someone a nazi, have the stones to do it directly, instead of burying it in a slew of incoherent weasel words.


187 posted on 04/13/2005 10:33:37 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Remember when conservatives embraced the rule of law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: All

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), Judiciary Committee Ranking Member: "I would object and fight against any filibuster on a judge." (Congressional Record, 6/18/98, p.S6522)


188 posted on 04/13/2005 10:33:44 PM PDT by Sun (Visit www.theEmpireJournal.com * Pray for Terri. Pray to end abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor
That's your opinion. I have a different opinion.

Noted....for sure.

189 posted on 04/13/2005 10:33:49 PM PDT by Cold Heat (This is not sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: lula; justshutupandtakeit
Who are you to decide the worth of anyone?

Good question lula, if I or anyone in my family is ever in a situation like Terri was I don't want the justshutupandtakeits of the world within a 100 mile vicinity.

190 posted on 04/13/2005 10:34:39 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
See what I mean? Any attempt at a rational discussion is met with this kind of hyperbolic nonsense from you. You are a disgrace to argument and persuasion...

This from a person who calls Keyes a "nut," and Savage a "screaming retard." Central Scrutiniser is on record as supporting Terri's "wishes to die." Therefore CS considers Michael Schiavo a credible source (who could easily pass a lie detector test).
CS's mantra is "rule of law" --- like a good German, CS considers the existing law paramount. If the law lets an atrocity slip through, so what? But CS says Terri had been dead for 15 years, so a single judge ordering her starved to death committed no atrocity. And the law passed by Congress to have Terri's case reviewed, what of the rule of that law?

191 posted on 04/13/2005 10:34:44 PM PDT by Graymatter (a Terri Schiavo Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
I don't want the justshutupandtakeits of the world within a 100 mile vicinity.

That world will come to you. You don't need to find it.

When it does, not if it does, I would love to be a fly on the wall to see your trials and tribulations.

You folks have no clue as to what you improperly inserted yourselves into.

But one day, you will get a education, whether you want it or not.

192 posted on 04/13/2005 10:39:26 PM PDT by Cold Heat (This is not sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

I don't believe I missed that at all. The three branches are not independent, they are linked by the US Constitution. They do not operate by different constitutions.

Delay is correct, Congress controls the extent of the judiciary, how far it may reach into the lives of the citizenry.

To say that the branches are 'equal' is not to say for example that the Executive branch need not respond to Congressional inquiries, need not show up under subpoena, need not respond to impeachment proceedings and verdicts.

To say that the Judicial branch is 'equal' is not to say that judges need not respond to Congressional subpoenas, need not consider laws passed by Congress, need not abide by the budgetary allocations set by Congress.

We have seen Congress cede its power to the other branches. It no longer 'declares' war, it no longer intercedes in bringing about floor votes over innocuous debate by a minority and it no longer affirms the proper layout of the judiciary.

Madison vs. Marbury has been left unchallenged not because the issues it embodies are complete and unequivocal, but because the conduct of the courts until recently in the last decade and a half have been self-restrained in a low profile state. All that is changing presently. Although Madison vs. Marbury will not likely be resurrected, judges will find themselves increasingly in contempt with the other branches until they relearn the wisdom and practicality of self-restraint.


193 posted on 04/13/2005 10:40:53 PM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
I said if the shoe fits, wear it. Actually something similiar to that, not quite that.

I was speaking in general about people who advoated Terri's death and then scream when they are compared to those who advoated and did these things in the mid 20th Century.

Tonight is the first time I've ever used the word Nazi on here and may I say, you're the one that brought up that word first.

This isn't failed anything that I say. It's not even emotional. It's the cold hard truth of what happened to Terri and those like her and what people like you advocate.

And stop the personal attacks about my maturity and intelligence. Is that the best you can do when your arguments fail to persuade people that we should kill/murder/exterminate more people like Terri? Or those with Alzheimers?

And again, I simply stated that I find it the upmost hypocrisy to advocate Nazi beliefs and practices and then scream when someone compares "you" to the Nazis.

Now grow up and Good day!

194 posted on 04/13/2005 10:42:49 PM PDT by Freedom Dignity n Honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

Yep, I think Keyes is a nut and I dislike Savage, that is an opinion on a subject not a poster. Savage and Keyes are subjects for debate and I address them that way. Now, if I were posting to those two people, as people, I would temper my comments and talk to them like I am to you.

Yeah, I am on record supporting Terri's wishes to die, thats my opinion, I also think that she was brain dead for 15 years. Now, you added the bit about a single judge ordering her starved to death not being an atrocity.

Be careful with your words, you got most right, but then you argued emotionally, not logically. I don't think it is the Feds role to get into this matter, it is too much government. Terri's situation happens every day, this was just a case where everyone used her to further their ends. I mean, we had freepers gushing about how great Jesse Jackson is, how strange is that?

Have a great night, and rethink your argumentation strategy, it will serve you well in the future.


195 posted on 04/13/2005 10:43:01 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Remember when conservatives embraced the rule of law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
It was exactly state resources which kept TS "alive" for many years, socialized medicine at its worse.

The problem is just how she qualified to be on Medicaid when her HINO and guardian lived in a $400,000 house and drove a Mercedes. The lawyers got paid most of her rehab money them finagled the laws to let the taxpayer foot the bill.

Oh! By the way Terri was very much alive.

196 posted on 04/13/2005 10:45:24 PM PDT by lula (Starving the disabled is OK, go to jail if you do the same to an animal...go figure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
I mean, we had freepers gushing about how great Jesse Jackson is, how strange is that?

Not strange at all. We also have FReepers gushing about how great Hillary is.

197 posted on 04/13/2005 10:45:56 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Just Blame President Bush For Everything, It Is Easier Than Using Your Brain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Freedom Dignity n Honor

So, are you calling me a nazi?

Just want to know yes or no for the record.

You have taken about 4 posts to try to explain your motives for attacking me, and each time it becomes more convoluted and strained. Yes, I used the nazi word first, not calling anyone a nazi, just remarking that the word has been slung around this place. You however picked it up and ascribed it to me, although you didn't have the guts to do it directly.

Buy a mirror, and grow up.


198 posted on 04/13/2005 10:46:17 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Remember when conservatives embraced the rule of law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
You folks have no clue as to what you improperly inserted yourselves into.

What I saw were two loving parents willing to take on the responsibility of caring for their daughter. What I also saw in Greer and Mikey were two Ice Men who just came out of a cave. No I don't want to ever be in that situation but should it happen putting someone to sleep like an animal is not an option and never will be.

199 posted on 04/13/2005 10:46:44 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: All

Its good to see everyone is calming down about all this


200 posted on 04/13/2005 10:47:16 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,021-1,034 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson