Precisely how they acted in this case, yet you condemn them because you disagree with the result.
Basically you are advocating judicial activism, but you cannot see this because of the noise.
BTW, just because a branch of government can do something, does not mean it is right, or even Constitutionally proper, or that they should do something because they can.
In addition, had there been time for arguments, the SCOTUS would have declared the legislation that Congress regurgitated unconstitutional in any case. Making your entire argument moot for this case. If Congress want to pass proper legislation regarding this issue, they can. But I don't see them jumping at the chance.
Are you deciding this for the rest of us?
...because you disagree with the result.
How do you know I disagree? Have I made a decision one way or the other?
Basically you are advocating judicial activism, but you cannot see this because of the noise.
Am I? What else am I doing here? You seem to know all about me.