Could you provide the exact instance where he ruled against the Constitution? He was relying on past judgements, not the act of an 'activist' judge.
SECOND, he went against Congress, and did what he pleased
Really? Hmmm, seems like Congress got what it wanted. The federal judiciary to stick its nose into someplace that it wasn't wanted nor needed. And mysteriously, the federal judiciary wasn't able to find this mysterious 'right' that the parents supposedly had. Lest we forget this was a judgement on guardianship.
Judge Greer should be IMPEACHED
But of course. Since he wasn't an 'activist' the way you wanted him to be, in that he would have to over turn precedence and create law from the bench to do what you desired, he must be impeached. Is that it?
It isn't to be an 'activist' to go back to fundamental law, such as is found in the Fifth Amendment and in Article One, Section Two of the FL Constitution, and to rule accordingly.
No judge has discretion to violate the fundamental right to life of our citizens.
This particular GOP CYA talking point is a dog that just ain't gonna hunt...at least with those who reference fundamental human rights as their political and legal compass. God help those who are naive enough to be taken in by this argument, and may God restrain those who know better but use it anyway in the name of partisanship.
WHERE in the Constitution does it say that it is permissible to murder an innocent woman?
Also, the following will get you started in self-education. After this, you will have to do your own homework.
http://www.theempirejournal.com/04020503_formal_complaint_filed.htm
Judge Greer’s rulings ought to be thrown out due to all these violations and the Supreme Court ruling on May 18, 2004 that states may be liable for money damages for denying disabled persons access to the court.
http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html