Isn't it weird how none of the WPPFF crowd will answer whether they were 100% sure that Terri wanted to starve to death? I wonder why not? Maybe they are not 100% sure? Interesting.....very interesting.
Are you sure she didn't want to be starved to death?
It was a dumb question to ask, yellow-dog.
I'm not 100% sure. Neither are you. Neither of us has heard the sworn testimony of those who spoke to the issue, tested in the crucible of cross-examination.
But only one of us is willing to substitute their opinion of that evidence for the opinion of those who DID hear it.
Are you 100% sure Terri wanted to live in a vegetative state and be continually force fed by the State for ever?
I am 100% sure that those who were charged with making that determination had clear and convincing evidence that she did not.
SO CORRECT!
I was for her parents being granted guardianship and letting the feeding tube remain. I've said that and others in the WPPFF have stated categorically they were against the feeding tube being removed, yet you merrily roll along lying about the thread as if everyone agreed on the case when you've been told differently repeatedly and yet you just ignore those facts.
Right on this thread Trinity Tx stated it flatly; she was against the feeding tube being removed. No matter. She was treated to being told how she was delirious with joy over the "murder" of Terri Schiavo and was treated to some bizarre conspiracy theory about being attached in some remote way to the hospice. Yet the poster purveying that oddball garbage wanders far and wide across the forum creating an atmosphere of kookdom.
That's what's weird. The rampant lying and rumor-mongering and vilification.
And seemingly capricious bannings.