See what I mean? Any attempt at a rational discussion is met with this kind of hyperbolic nonsense from you. You are a disgrace to argument and persuasion. Is it any wonder that this has caused such a rift on FR?
We can argue the argument, not the poster if you like. I think Delay and lots of people on Terri's side lost a whole lot of credibility by saying stupid, extremist emotional words in this battle.
BTW, no, I didn't delight in Schiavo's "murder" I also didn't delight in the so called conservatives all of a sudden abandoning the rule of law that was so important to adhere to during the impeachment.
Right. This coming from somebody who sneered about "the Terri crowd" (post #16). You could cut the hypocrisy with a chainsaw.
I also didn't delight in the so called conservatives all of a sudden abandoning the rule of law
You're confused. Schiavo's murder had nothing to do with "the rule of law" and everything to do with the rule of some scumbag county probate judge and a bunch of other political whores who didn't have the guts to stand up and do the right thing. So now she's dead, and that's forever. Congratulations.
This from a person who calls Keyes a "nut," and Savage a "screaming retard." Central Scrutiniser is on record as supporting Terri's "wishes to die." Therefore CS considers Michael Schiavo a credible source (who could easily pass a lie detector test).
CS's mantra is "rule of law" --- like a good German, CS considers the existing law paramount. If the law lets an atrocity slip through, so what? But CS says Terri had been dead for 15 years, so a single judge ordering her starved to death committed no atrocity. And the law passed by Congress to have Terri's case reviewed, what of the rule of that law?