This woman had the right to defend herself and no person deprived her because of her physical disability. She could have reached for a fork any time she wanted.
and to acquire, possess and protect property; except that the ownership, inheritance, disposition and possession of real property by aliens ineligible for citizenship may be regulated or prohibited by law ...
Seems that the law found the parents tried to usurp the hubbie's rights.
Stupidest thing I've ever heard you say, and that's saying alot.
By your standard, it would be lawful to starve babies to death.
Welcome to '68 grunt World'...
Actually the 2DCA in Florida found that Micheal Schiavo was conflicted because there was money involved and he had broken the marriage contract. Contracts, marriage or otherwise, apparently are just pieces of paper to you.
Moreover, Florida law prohibits any guardian from being appointed who "may have a conflcit of interest". Which is why Terri Sciavos death was court ordered. When states issue orders condemning citizens to death American jurisprudence and precedent requires judicial review on the federal level. When you argue against that, you argue against the Constitution and individual rights.
I'll take the word of the nurse who cared for Terri for four months over yours, thanks.
Terri lit up when she entered the room. Laughed at her dumb jokes. Ate jello cubes smuggled in to her in defiance of her alleged husband's demands that she be fed nothing by mouth, etc.
But again, your argument is a red herring anyway, since the right to life is inalienable, according to the Constitution.
You ought to read it sometime.