Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
You seem to be construing the "basic rights" language as a list of entitlements that cannot be regulated.

Are you saying that other statutory or common law rules are rendered unenforceable to the extent that they affect or govern the enumerated "basic rights" (i.e., "to enjoy and defend life and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and protect property")?

751 posted on 04/15/2005 7:39:46 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies ]


To: atlaw
You seem to be construing the "basic rights" language as a list of entitlements that cannot be regulated. Are you saying that other statutory or common law rules are rendered unenforceable to the extent that they affect or govern the enumerated "basic rights" (i.e., "to enjoy and defend life and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and protect property")?

I'm saying that it doesn't take a lawyer to understand that the Constitution in clear and unmistakable language precludes the government or an individual from taking the life of a citizen short of a conviction of a capital crime.

In fact, it would seem that most attorneys now have had their minds so clouded by petty legalisms that it seems to preclude them from understanding such a basic fact.

Proverbally, our legal minds would seem to have perfected straining our gnats while swallowing camels.

769 posted on 04/15/2005 8:02:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("It's better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in man." -Psalm 118:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies ]

To: atlaw
You seem to be construing the "basic rights" language as a list of entitlements that cannot be regulated. Are you saying that other statutory or common law rules are rendered unenforceable to the extent that they affect or govern the enumerated "basic rights" (i.e., "to enjoy and defend life and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and protect property")?

I'm saying that it doesn't take a lawyer to understand that the Constitution in clear and unmistakable language precludes the government or an individual from taking the life of a citizen short of a conviction of a capital crime.

In fact, it would seem that most attorneys now have had their minds so clouded by petty legalisms that it seems to preclude them from understanding such a basic fact.

Proverbally, our legal minds would seem to have perfected straining out gnats while swallowing camels.

770 posted on 04/15/2005 8:02:31 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("It's better to trust in the Lord, than to put confidence in man." -Psalm 118:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson