Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Thanks for clarifying that your holiness. For everyone who has not made themselves their own Pope and judge of the Magisterium:

So is John F. McCarthy pope?

158 posted on 09/26/2005 7:02:58 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: HapaxLegamenon; Hermann the Cherusker
So is John F. McCarthy pope?

Paul VI was Pope and the articles referenced by Hermann show how wrong you are about the claimed contradiction between DH and QC.

Please consider that you may be wrong and the Catholic Church right.

186 posted on 09/26/2005 10:44:27 AM PDT by gbcdoj (Let us ask the Lord with tears, that according to his will so he would shew his mercy to us Jud 8:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: HapaxLegamenon; gbcdoj; bornacatholic
Thanks for clarifying that your holiness. For everyone who has not made themselves their own Pope and judge of the Magisterium:

So is John F. McCarthy pope?

Fr. McCarthy is not Pope. Rather, Fr. McCarthy attempts to show how Dignitatis Humane and Quanta Cura are not contradictory, that being one of the bedrock principles of the Catholic Magisterium - non-contradiction of papal teaching. In this sense, he is acting as a faithful theologian attempt to resolve the perplexing question you raise.

Remember, if we have two documents from the Popes A and B which appear to be contradictory, the misunderstanding is ALWAYS on our part in not comprehending the Papal teaching, not on the part of the Pope and his supposed misunderstanding of the intention and thoughts of his predeessors.

198 posted on 09/26/2005 2:44:23 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson