.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
After a weekend break from a court case involving intelligent design, the Dover school board officials will face business as usual. The board today will hold its first school board meeting since the trial began.
On Sunday, Dover school board member David Napierski said he sympathized with the time fellow members Shelia Harkins and Alan Bonsell have spent on the court case.
“I really haven’t seen it erode them from their duties,” he said. “It definitely has taken a lot of their time . . . I think it is sapping some of the people, too.”
The trial began Sept. 26 in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg. It resumes Wednesday.
Napierski hopes to attend at least one day per week of the trial.
“We’re seeing one side of the whole picture right now,” he said. “I think it’s going to go all the way up to the Supreme Court.”
He said dealing with the court case while running the school district is a “double-edged sword.
“I just hope and pray that our focus will stay on business,” he said.
School district residents might have a difficult time resuming day-to-day life as it was before the trial began.
Lonnie Langioni left his position as a school board member in Dover in 2003. He said the issue has divided the community and he wants folks to again be friends.
“We’re just going to have to let it run its course,” he said about the trial. “I’m just waiting for the day that this is all over and that the people of Dover can go back to talking to each other again.”
He said he follows the case and reads newspapers and articles online.
“It’s crossed all kinds of lines,” he said of the trial. “Dover is a great community. We all need to respect each others’ viewpoints.”
Former Dover school board member Barrie Callahan, a plaintiff in the court case, is ready to spend more time in court this week.
“The case needs to proceed,” she said Saturday. “I know the issue. To see it through the process is truly fascinating.
“You’re seeing the best of the best,” she said about attorneys. “It is an honor to be in their presence.”
She said she’s been following news of the trial posted online.
“It’s not about little tiny Dover,” she said. “This case really, really is important.”
UPDATE
Trial schedule: The trial resumes Wednesday and Thursday in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg and is scheduled to continue Oct. 12, 14, 17 through 21, 24, 27 and Nov. 2 through 4.
At stake: It’s the most significant court challenge to evolution since 1987, and it’s the first time a court has been asked to rule whether intelligent design can be taught in public schools. Experts say the case’s outcome could influence how science is defined and taught in schools across the country. The lead defense lawyer said he wanted to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Coming this week: Among the scheduled witnesses: Dover school district science teacher Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and plaintiffs Cynthia Sneath, Joel Leib and Deb Fenimore.
Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University, also is scheduled. Forrest co-authored “Creationism’s Trojan Horse,” subtitled “The Wedge of Intelligent Design.”
Government money is peanuts compared to what religious organizations would contribute to any research that showed the promise of revealing a creator/designer. But the Discovery Institute has tipped its hand by revealing there is no such research, and no prospects for such research.
My life aint devoted to outing every new person that decides to join the thread.
Unlike you I'm not paranoid about running background checks on everyone.
If you want a closed discussion go open your own chat room on yahooo (its free) and yap, yap, yap away all day.
Until then...
Hello...I'm right here!!
I guess I need to translate my "sheesh" for the benefit of others.
Sheesh = some people work hard at trying to get back on these Fr threads after they've already had some history here in the past.
You evo fella's (& occasional ladies) need to realize how much love others have for you.
Tee Hee Hee, a bug in his ear? or a burr under his saddle? or maybe need some Preparation H?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Yeah, but that's no good - they want the imprimatur of science, such that their theological meanderings are defined as "science", with the legitimacy attendant to that. IOW, they want to join the club, and they'd really like it if the courts made it so they could join without paying any dues or otherwise meeting the membership requirements.
As soon as they start to build up a ping list, the thing starts to disintegrate. Just like the case for creationism. Gotta admire their determination.
Mine is doing just fine.
[Thunderous applause!]
I've experienced the blistering and scathing "love" creationists supposedly have for us over the past seven years. The only "love" many seem to exhibit is the love of seeing us burning forever in the Lake of Fire.
In other words, like Doonesbury.
Exactly. Note the "How about I just smite thee" cartoon in the post before yours, and how the creationist's clothing and briefcase implies that he's a lawyer, forcing his way in by court action.
You're just too sharp for me.
Great cartoons!
If we can't understand "typos" how can we possibly tell design?
ROFL!
Once you gets edumucated, youll lern yerself that evilutionst is wrong!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.