To: NVD
Your post is irrelevant. ID is presented as a scientific theory, not as part of a religion.
I have aske for months for any ID advocate to discuss the methods and motives of the designer, and I have been assured that ID says nothing about the identity or motives of the designer.
148 posted on
11/11/2005 6:25:40 PM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: js1138
In my philosophy, ID and my world view go fit together like a hand in a glove. My God is the intelligent designer, as he was for centuries and centuries. And most many of the same naturalists you have quoted in the past, followed the formula above.
Try to wrap your brain around this....
Most evolutionists or naturalistic scientists insist that an intelligent cause has no place in science. But the truth is that several branches of science use the concept of intelligence and have even devised tests for detecting work of an intelligent design. Consider forensic science. When a police finds a body the first question is, Was death the result of natural causes or foul play (an intentional act of an intelligent agent)? Pathologists perform a battery of fairly straightforward tests to get the answer. This same fact can be said for the likes of cryptographers, archaeologists, and astronomers. So are naturalistic scientists and intelligent design related.....a resounding yes is the answer!
176 posted on
11/11/2005 6:56:29 PM PST by
NVD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson