Replies

"My posts have not indicated support for anyone's position but my own"

Your standing up for a disgusting series of posts. That's support. And when asked to speak against them, you refused.

"Post #461 does not contain "praise." You just wish it did. It merely raises questions anyone is free to answer."

You are deluding yourself. From post 461:

"So often I hear you "knee jerk" moralists demean and condemn others who faced with the holocaust in our country, have the courage to go after abortionists at the sacrifice of their own lives and liberty in an effort to slow down or halt this brutal, cruel, sadistic practice. Tell me something MeanWest, what gives you the right to critize these people? What have you sacrificed for these little ones?"

Then there is a different poster in post 541,

"Though I myself am a coward,I respect those heroes who are portrayed as evil, by the very ones who enable the true evil to continue." (speaking of abortion clinic bombers)

You entered the discussion in post 557, but failed to say one word against the above.

"It is not a logical conclusion to assume someone condones the bombing of abortion clinics when he merely states that beating up a loony professor is not on the same level as dealing with genocidal tyrants or abortionists."

That's not all you said. You refuse to say that post 461 was wrong. You lumped abortion doctors with genocidal tyrants.

"It is a logical conclusion however, to assume someone is both delusional and disingenuous when he continually talks about terrorism in a thread related to pugilism in an attempt to paint other people in a bad light."

I wasn't the one who brought up blowing people up. Should we have just ignored it? What would that say to the lurkers here? It would say that we condone that. Silence speaks as loud as words sometimes.

BTW, beating someone up isn't *pugilism*. It's assault.

"But hey, since you can't tell the difference between sarcasm and gloating it stands to reason you can't tell the difference between beating up a loony professor and dealing with genocidal tyrants."

Are abortion doctors genocidal tyrants who need killing?

You're standing up for a disgusting series of posts.

What do you mean, "Standing up for?" I'm just not an alarmist like you. I don't read between the lines, jump to stupid conclusions, and badger people when they express opinions of a moral nature. I'll let their words speak for themselves. A discussion about terrorists and such is not germane to this thread, but like a broken record you keep claiming it is. I don't care if you brought it up or not. You might as well have. What do abortion and terrorism have to do with a professor who was allegedly assaulted?

Furthermore, post 461 was not even addressed to me. It was addressed to another individual who noted there are numerous cases of Christians indulging in hateful acts, much as pummeling a hapless professor is a hateful act (whether done by Christians or anyone else).

That seems to be your favorite post. It's like a sweet morsel to you. Like a pig wallowing in filth you'd like to spread it around and pretend all Christians are complicit in unwarranted acts of violence. Maybe I should respond to the remainder of your posts in "oinks."