[Fester Chugabrew]

Ask the poster of post 461, he brought them into the discussion.

I'll take that as a tacit admission that abortion and terrorism have little to do with a professor who was allegedly assaulted. By your silence regarding the apparent cause for bubblehead's bruises I will take it as tacit admission that you support the formation of university classes solely intended to ridicule the beliefs of others. Why do you support university classes to make fun of other people?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I'll take that as a tacit admission that abortion and terrorism have little to do with a professor who was allegedly assaulted."

I never said it did. That was your linkage. I was responding to a repugnant statement by someone else. If the thread had been about taxes, and the poster made a side comment about killing abortionists, I would have reacted the same way. You are obsessed with linking this with the professors alleged beating, when I have made no such claim. I won't apologize for calling out someone who is an apologist for terrorism. No matter what the original topic of the thread was.

"By your silence regarding the apparent cause for bubblehead's bruises I will take it as tacit admission that you support the formation of university classes solely intended to ridicule the beliefs of others."

?? The cause of his bruises were either two morons who should be in jail, or the whole thing was made up. Whether the professor is a left-wing idiot or not doesn't change the fact that an attack on him physically, if it happened, is wrong.

"Why do you support university classes to make fun of other people?"

I don't. Why are you changing the topic?