Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Protagoras
It's only your opinion that those are the only two choices.

Not really. The coincidence of steadily decreasing drug laws and the explosion of gun control is too obvious for the attentive to miss. As drug use goes up, gun violence goes up and increased gun control occurs.

From Patrick Purdy in Stockton, California, to Thomas Hamilton in Dunblane, Scotland, the one common denominator is a long known history of mental illness. That marijuana causes increased psychotic episodes, in the known mentally ill, is also another common precursor to violence.

I'm willing to bet you a $1,000.00 that those who have gone "postal" have used pot, or another illegal drug, or stopped their legal "meds", at least 72 hours before they started shooting people.

159 posted on 12/27/2005 12:28:12 PM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: elbucko
Until you can prove the things you say, it is only your opinion.

The bet thing is a real non starter on-line.

Not to mention the research you have to do to prove your dubious point.

160 posted on 12/27/2005 12:37:58 PM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: elbucko
As drug use goes up, gun violence goes up and increased gun control occurs.

Please provide evidence that drug use has gone up.

163 posted on 12/27/2005 12:49:11 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

To: elbucko
The coincidence of steadily decreasing drug laws

What decreasing drug laws? At the beginning of the 20th century, you could legally buy cocaine, in your Coke-a-Cola no less, smoke whatever you wished, and you could also own whatever firearm you chose without any federal permission. It's not just a coincidence that the first federal firearm law was patterned after the Harrison Narcotics Act. Very explicitly so in fact according to the testimony of the Attorney General before Congress when the NFA was being debated and passed. Both laws used, illegitimately IMHO, the delegated power to tax to regulate what was otherwise not within the delegated powers of the federal government to regulate and in the case of the National Firearms Act, to infringe upon that which the Constitution states "shall not be infringed".

It's also probably no coincidence that these laws were passed shortly after the repeal of alcohol prohibition.

167 posted on 12/27/2005 2:04:51 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson