That's fine with me as long as you admit there's no evidence of "treason" under the U.S. Constitution.
Clarence, I never mentioned "treason" or the "Constitution". The definition I related to was the dictionary definition of traitor........."one who betrays a cause".
There is nothing to "admit to" as I never discussed that. I only referred to the "conservative cause" and the betrayal of that conservative cause, thus a traitor to the conservative cause. (The cause that FR is all about).