Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan
You're problem with the WOD isn't the enforcement, abuses, or money spent, but the derived authority of the enforcer and the treasurer?

Got it.

You seem to have decided to start working both sides of the debate, asking questions and then providing your own answers. Maybe this time it will turn out like you want it.

181 posted on 04/09/2006 1:57:21 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
You seem to have decided to start working both sides of the debate, asking questions and then providing your own answers. Maybe this time it will turn out like you want it.

I asked questions, you gave answers (which I found illogical), and I restated them for clarification. I was working off you position that it "wasn't about 'Legalization'", but about putting things back where they belonged.

Apparently you think I misstated your position. Please amplify. I'll make them simple, so I don't get confused, please respond by number.

1. Are you for or against the legalization of drugs?

2. Is the problem, as it relates to the thread, that there is abuse or that the wrong government is involved in the abuse?

3. Do you believe the Federal government has the Constitutional power to regulate and/or prohibit the imports from abroad?

4. What if any authority do you believe the FBI should have?

Now if you can answer those, per the numbers, I won't have to restate things for you in order to grasp your positions.

182 posted on 04/09/2006 4:27:41 PM PDT by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson