Replies

Look friend, the only thing "loaded" about my questions is that they are clear, thus requiring clear answers. I still have no freakin idea what your real positions are beyond the esoteric, because you don't want to defend them, so you won't state them.

I'm not trying to trick you, I'm trying to understand your position. This is difficult as you back away from everything, as soon as I point out the problems with the alternative.

Let me give you an "example" for #1.

1. "For legalization, because God gave us self-determination and you can't stop people bent on self destruction."

Now I might disagree with that. I might think it callous. And I'll tell you that. But I don't think it requires "wanting to see babies hooked on crack".

You somehow think I'm trying to trick you, or get you, or that I think you have no basis. You are wrong on all counts. I just don't think the WOD is a good, rational, or tactically sound place for you to start your crusade. Additionally, I find your assertion that this makes me a roll in the pork, federal pie eater to be absurd.

I'm closer to your position than 95% of the population. If you can't have a civil, honest discussion with me, where you address the challenges to your ideas, then you might as well forget about the other 45% that you will need.

2. You're problem with the WOD isn't the enforcement, abuses, or money spent, but the derived authority of the enforcer and the treasurer?
Got it. I'll work on getting the federal gov. out of classrooms and you can work on getting the to stop chasing drug runners.

That didn't look like a reply from someone interested in a serious, civil discussion. If I misunderstood, I apoligize.

SampleMan asked at #151:

Tell me again about the section of the Constitution that makes drug use a unenfringable right?

The 14th makes clear that governments cannot deprive people of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. - In other words, laws must be both written & enforced using Constitutional due process.

--- No reply. --
Now, I see SampleMan say:

Look friend, the only thing "loaded" about my questions is that they are clear, thus requiring clear answers.

I still have no freakin idea what your real positions are ---

I'm not trying to trick you, I'm trying to understand your position.

This is difficult as you back away from everything, ---

I see hypocrisy.

If you can't have a civil, honest discussion with me, where you address the challenges to your ideas, ---

Care to address my challenge to your ideas, sampleman?