What on earth is your point? A "motion picture" could be a series of still photographs of moving objects, or it could be a series of drawn or painted images, or it could be a series of photographs of objects being manipulated between photographs.
At least some versions of ID seem to argue for the claymation interpretation of reality.
That's what I was trying to figure out about the analogy of motion pictures in reply to my observation that universal common descent is not evidence, it is an explantion of evidence.
Cordially,