[Thatcherite]

I have yet to see an evolutionist offer an "evidence" on FR that cannot be distilled on the simplistic template of "similarity in morphology is sufficient evidence for commonality of descent."

Then you haven't been looking very hard. There is so much evidence not based on "similarity in morphology is sufficient evidence for commonality of descent." that you could spend your entire life reading it.

[furball4paws]

I've tried this in the past with interesting thoughts from every where.

Let's divide the spectrum into 4 camps.

1. Liberal Bible Worshipers and anti-science nuts.
2. Conservative Bible worshipers and anti-scinces nuts.
3. Liberal Evilutionists
4. Conservative Evilutionists.

#1 can have Massachusetts
#2 can have the South so they won't have to move.
#3 can have California since they already have it any way.
#4 can live here in the Rockies.

Question:

Who do you think will survive and prosper, and why?