[Dimensio]

evo is not remotely important to science)

You continue to repeat this claim. You should know that your continued repetition has made it no less false now than it was the first time you stated it.

[balrog666]

You continue to repeat this claim. You should know that your continued repetition has made it no less false now than it was the first time you stated it.

Some people are incapable of learning even the simplest thing.

[Mamzelle]

Let me tone down my generalization-- Evo is not remotely important to real science.

The science that gives us new medicines, treatments--the science that holds the bridges up as we drive over them--the science that flicks a comet going 100K miles/hr with a craft going 18K miles/hr--the science that is accountable--the science that provides.

The science that really matters.

Evo is just a reasonable story of what may have happened. It accomplishes nothing--nothing important depends on its veracity or its BS.

[metmom]

Science is important to evolution but there sure are an awful lot of branches of science where evolution does not even come into play. None of the chemistry, physics, oceanography, limnology, astronomy, or meteorology courses I took were even remotely dependent on evolution or an understanding of it. In some of the courses in was mentioned breifly but it sure wasn't the basis for it and a *proper* understanding of it was not required. It's a good thing too, with the way I'm finding out that evolution is being taught in public high schools.