Fabulous. Whether or not you accept them as evidence of common descent I trust I have now laid to rest your complaint that:
I have yet to see an evolutionist offer an "evidence" on FR that cannot be distilled on the simplistic template of "similarity in morphology is sufficient evidence for commonality of descent."
...the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle..." - Francis Crick, Nobel Laureate
Ignoring for the moment the dishonesty of this quote (exposed elsewhere on this thread), why do you think the method by which life first began affects the validity of the theory of evolution?
Courtesy ping to 294