Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
Evolution qualifies on both counts.

I noticed that you've stated this without going on to actually provide examples of experimentation that has demonstrated phylization empirically. That's because it doesn't exist. The "typical" experimental evidence (moths, finches, etc) is a bait and switch tactic which has no relevance to what you are actually trying to prove.

It's quite simple really - demonstrate endosymbiosis of Prokaryotes under the microscope, collect your Nobel, and be done with it.
460 posted on 04/19/2006 8:13:15 PM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]


To: Old_Mil
phylization

Is that your own word? Want to try again in English?

That's because it doesn't exist. The "typical" experimental evidence (moths, finches, etc) is a bait and switch tactic which has no relevance to what you are actually trying to prove.

Attempted proof by assertion. If small changes can be demonstrated over small time intervals, it is reasonable, in the absence of contrary evidence, to infer that proportionately larger changes will occur over larger intervals.

It's quite simple really - demonstrate endosymbiosis of Prokaryotes under the microscope, collect your Nobel, and be done with it.

Prokaryotic endosymbiosis has been demonstrated in the laboratory for at least a half a century, ignoramus. They don't award Nobel Prizes for things you can discover by cracking open a biology textbook. But don't let that dissuade you. It would be a good idea for you to learn some biology, regardless.

465 posted on 04/19/2006 8:22:09 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson