[Old_Mil]

Sure you have. Ichneumon's posts would be an example. You HAVE actually read them, right?

I have read them, and they fit that template exactly. They just go into more technical detail than most of the readers here are capable of understanding.

Which experiments?

Should have thrown in the /sarc tag. The point being that there are no such experiments, despite their existence being essential to proving the real world applicability of endosymbiotic theory.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I have read them, and they fit that template exactly. They just go into more technical detail than most of the readers here are capable of understanding."

Including you apparently, because his posts do not say that "similarity in morphology is sufficient evidence for commonality of descent.".

"The point being that there are no such experiments, despite their existence being essential to proving the real world applicability of endosymbiotic theory."

Nobody who knew anything about the subject would make such a silly statement. You are expecting a series of events that took millions of years to be condensed into a lab experiment? Scientists do NOT have to demonstrate endosymbiosis in the lab for there to be sufficient evidence that it happened. The same way geologists don't have to demonstrate the formation of the Hawaiian islands in a lab to be able to provide lots of evidence about how they formed.