[b_sharp]

"'m saying that the "facts" that Science know as "facts", points as much, or more, to Intelligent Design than Evolution. That Science chooses to proffer a convoluted, and silly looking when put on film, theory. Is the problem."

And what I am saying is the 'facts' you believe support ID over evolution do so because you 1) Have a very poor understanding of the SToE. 2) You have a limited understanding of ID. 3) In your misunderstanding, ID fits in better with your personal belief system.

[MissAmericanPie]

I know what the scientific definition of "fact" is in the scientific community. Fact: does not mean with absolute certainty.

Just like the scientific communities flim flam pointing to the 2% difference between men and chimps, and not pointing out that there is only a 3% difference between a man and an ear of corn. Fact does not mean with absolute certainty in science. There are so many black boxes in their theory, that the veiwing of it on film, well lets just say that it is very revealing.