And I am not wrong about nucleotides, used to determine the difference between corn vs man vs chimp, nor am I wrong about the percentage difference between the two vs man, or how the scientific community dishonestly attempted to impress the masses with that 2% difference.
"What science has pr oven, is that Genesis stands as a very reliable template so far."
What science has demonstrated is that Genesis is a lousy source for scientific research.
"From, "Let there be light" to the order of species development."
The order of species development is wrong in Genesis.
"And most likely to the eventual discovery that life's building blocks are to be found in the molecules in the dust of the earth."
Not likely to be found in the *dust*.
"And I am not wrong about nucleotides, used to determine the difference between corn vs man vs chimp, nor am I wrong about the percentage difference between the two vs man, or how the scientific community dishonestly attempted to impress the masses with that 2% difference."
Yes you are; you are outstandingly wrong. The difference genetically between a human and corn is FAR greater than 3%. I am still waiting for you to provide ANY cites for that 3% figure. The real number is actually over 30%.