| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Enough noise from this damn thing. |
Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7
I’m happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism — indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)
(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
"Evo is junk science" = "Bush lied!"
Both empty assertions without evidence.
" We'll wait. Go for it. Impress the lurkers. Now's your chance! Don't let it slip by."
ok you've convinced me with your charming personality.
At least admit your bias.
You have already conceded the point.
Was Ann a cheerleader? Maybe she's bringing out some deep psychic high-school fears in these poor lads.
Calling it a theory without evidence.
First of all, that's 'misogynistic'. If you're going to insult someone, spell it correctly.
Second, it's not misogynistic. There are male bimbos, and I have no compunction about identifying them. If Coulter were male, balding, overweight, and 45, she'd be an unknown kook.
Skull spam placemarker
Do you want to laugh, or do you want to play Spelling Nazi?
Better cross out Steyn :-)
No need. While Steyn makes a few simple-minded offhand mistatements about biology and evolutionists (even Steyn later admitted, "Not my bag, so I kept it short."), that hardly puts him in the same class as someone who would uncritically parrot wholesale large portions of long-discredited anti-science propaganda without doing his/her homework and due diligence, in a book which presents itself as a well-researched tome.
But in any case, yeah, Steyn would be a poor person to turn to for insights into modern biology. Then again, he admits that this is not his best area of knowledge.
[Thunderous applause!]
she makes them relevant?
is puritan fashion real popular in Nebraska?
I take it you won't venture a go on the Wheel o' Pre-homonids? Aw, that's too bad.
"You have already conceded the point."
Ahh so I should just willy nilly accept whatever abuse other people choose to throw at me? nonsense
pro-evo's want creationists to disprove their theory using their data, their processes, and there rules. I push back to you to prove God didn't create life using my creationist rules.
I've been accused of lying, being ignorant, stupid and on and on. All because I ask questions like, if man evolved from apes why are the still apes, or why have so many scientists lied about their "proof", or expressed disbelief that life as we know it evolved from bacteria in raindrops or pond scum or whatever else someone thinks up to utilize their grant money.
Sorry, even if Tony Snow hadn't bungled a lot of science (and he did), that still wouldn't constitute anything like what I was asking for. You might want to work on your reading comprehension.
Care to try again, or would you like to admit that you really haven't a clue, are totally unable to substantiate your goofy assertion that "evo is junk science", and that the "best" you can manage is to fling random links to essays that just happen to mention evolution, albeit not address the question that was actually asked?
You anti-evolution folks are hilarious, I can always count on you to act like buffoons totally out of your depth and seldom able to even grasp the questions, much less have any of the answers.
Consider yourself ignored.
You sound rather hysterical. You make no sense.
No indeed. Why, you can often find women hear in town wearing shiny black latex dresses. I've heard 9th street near the Capitol is a prime spot.
Just trying to improve the site. Misogynistic is probably a word you use often. Better you should know how to spell it.
Just trying to improve the site. Misogynistic is probably a word you use often. Better you should know how to spell it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.