Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Enough noise from this damn thing.



Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter weighs in on Darwinism
uncommondescent.com ^ | William Dembski

Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 961-962 next last
To: Mamzelle
You know, I've heard a lot things in these crevo threads: evolution is atheism, christianity is the enemy of science, evolution is a marxist theory, et cetera.

But you sir, your claim takes the freaking cake. Never before has such an irrelevant and uncorroborated accusation graced my unworthy eyes.

I bow before you, Great Troll King, and I pledge my service to your hollow tin crown.
221 posted on 04/27/2006 1:33:15 PM PDT by Boxen (You're thinking in Japanese. If you must think, do it in German!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Conclusion

In conclusion, our genus Homo appears to have been intelligently designed and is not connected to the australopithecine apes or any other apes through ancestry:

1. The alleged australopithecine ancestors are very different from the earliest members of Homo,

2. Homo appears suddenly and distinct, without transitions in the fossil record from any earlier forms, and

3. Subsequent forms of Homo are variants of and very similar to the initial forms of Homo.


Figure 9. A) An approximation of a common hominid phylogeny or family tree, under an evolutionary perspective. Adapted from reference 8. Many hominid phylogenies place Australopithecus afarensis arising from the hominid Ardipithicus ramidus a little over 4 million years ago. B) Hominid phylogeny under intelligent design, reflecting basic types among hominids. Basic type Homo is unrelated to basic type Australopithecus. Dates have been left off to illustrate only lines of ancestry.

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1146

Humans were and always have been humans.


222 posted on 04/27/2006 1:33:54 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

I apologize. It was the impression you gave us on previous threads.


223 posted on 04/27/2006 1:34:35 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
...beta males.

lol

224 posted on 04/27/2006 1:35:05 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Mamzelle's on my virtual ignore list. I don't speak to people who are pathologically bitter.


225 posted on 04/27/2006 1:35:22 PM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Boxen

See #225.


226 posted on 04/27/2006 1:36:27 PM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

you can believe all the junk science you want. global warming, Evo. space aliens, Xenu. I don't care.


227 posted on 04/27/2006 1:36:42 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Attacking a woman's opinions based on what she looks like, and his proferred dislike for her looks--that's mysogyny.

It's also utterly juvenile--something an insecure adolescent male would do when he feels threatened by someone who happens to be female. "Fading looks"--Gee, is that supposed to be so devastating? Scientific?

Ann is a much better writer than public personality. "Treason" was particularly good.

228 posted on 04/27/2006 1:37:00 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr

Don't you think this "virtual ignore" stuff is a beta male attribute? Why can't someone just ignore someone? Why do they need a mod to do their ignoring for them?


229 posted on 04/27/2006 1:38:43 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Read Later Placemarker


230 posted on 04/27/2006 1:41:29 PM PDT by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Your arguments are refuted continually.


231 posted on 04/27/2006 1:42:10 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

The "Darwinist Imams" smear was a childish insult.


232 posted on 04/27/2006 1:43:12 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
In conclusion, our genus Homo appears to have been intelligently designed and is not connected to the australopithecine apes or any other apes through ancestry:

1. The alleged australopithecine ancestors are very different from the earliest members of Homo,

2. Homo appears suddenly and distinct, without transitions in the fossil record from any earlier forms, and

3. Subsequent forms of Homo are variants of and very similar to the initial forms of Homo.

 

Australopithecus afarensis

Homo Habilis


233 posted on 04/27/2006 1:44:41 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

I see the wisdom in your approach.


234 posted on 04/27/2006 1:45:08 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

Comment #235 Removed by Moderator

To: Tribune7

Uh-Oh! Looks some some people will now be trying to get Ann banned at FreeRepublic!


236 posted on 04/27/2006 1:46:14 PM PDT by Hacksaw (Deport illegals the same way they came here - one at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

I thought it pretty much refuted your arguments.


237 posted on 04/27/2006 1:46:47 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Attacking a woman's opinions based on what she looks like, and his proferred dislike for her looks--that's mysogyny.

You cannot be that dense (what am I saying?). The point they were making is that her looks are the only reason anyone listens to her. That's not mysogyny. Mysogyny is the hatred of women in general. Disliking one woman in particular in no way even equates to mysogyny.

238 posted on 04/27/2006 1:47:15 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

"Virtual Ignore" does not require moderator intervention.


239 posted on 04/27/2006 1:47:56 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
The "Darwinist Imams" smear was a childish insult.

Well what are they? I know its some sort of cult.

240 posted on 04/27/2006 1:48:28 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 961-962 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson