Boy are you lost. I don't post the pictures of the skulls. And, the many of the folks you are debating are actually working scientists -- some of their screennames actually give their professions away.
BION, I know a few working scientists. None of them care much about the issue of evo, and none of their work depends on the "belief" in evo.
Science is accountable. Cosmology, archeology, paleontology, antrhopology...none are sciences. All can be interesting, but they create scenarios which at worst are merely replaced with newer and more interesting scenarios. Conjecture. Plausibility.
An archeologist is never wrong the way a simple lab technician can be wrong.
If it can't be wrong, it's not science. If it's not reproducible, accountable, verifiable--then it's speculation. Maybe reasonable speculation--but plausible and reasonable is the A standard for speculation. A+ in conjecture, in the spinning of yarns.