Are you speaking from ignorance by accusing all evos of being atheists?
There are a lot of one note posters on this forum.
On PJ's Dummie Funnies there are people who post there who I don't see in the rest of the forum.
On threads about immigration the same thing.
Same with the Duke threads.
It doesn't mean anything besides the fact you have no argument so you must go fishing for one.
All the arguments have been stated many times over. You ignore our arguments and we ignore yours. Shows we all have too much time on our hands.
Conclusion
In conclusion, our genus Homo appears to have been intelligently designed and is not connected to the australopithecine apes or any other apes through ancestry:
1. The alleged australopithecine ancestors are very different from the earliest members of Homo,
2. Homo appears suddenly and distinct, without transitions in the fossil record from any earlier forms, and
3. Subsequent forms of Homo are variants of and very similar to the initial forms of Homo.
Figure 9. A) An approximation of a common hominid phylogeny or family tree, under an evolutionary perspective. Adapted from reference 8. Many hominid phylogenies place Australopithecus afarensis arising from the hominid Ardipithicus ramidus a little over 4 million years ago. B) Hominid phylogeny under intelligent design, reflecting basic types among hominids. Basic type Homo is unrelated to basic type Australopithecus. Dates have been left off to illustrate only lines of ancestry.
http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1146
Humans were and always have been humans.