if now she's supporting anti-science or pseudo-science, 1) I'll never buy another one of her books, and 2) I'll be a lot more careful quoting from her previous ones as though she had actually researched something and knew what she was talking about.]
"Never buy a book, more careful quoting her..."
oh yeah, I'm sure she has the whole "liberals are bad for America thing" wrong.
Just becuase someone has a different opinion about evolution discredits her opinions on everything else?
puh-lease!!!
considering her as Michael Moore?
HAHAHHAHAHA...ich, you better lighten up on the starch...your neckties are getting too tight.
No, she might have a reasonable opinion on other things. But it does call her integrity, credibility and honesty into question.
I'll not be buying any more of her books if she in fact is supporting anti-science.
(Assuming the worst here)
Either she has been educated in science, and knows better, and is dishonestly playing demagogue, OR she's uneducated, but instead of consulting experts, she consulted Dembski. That, in fact, would be very M. Moorish.
Like I said, I'll have to see excerpts from her book before making judgment.
There are a lot of honest conservative authors left