Dinosaur Shocker (YEC say dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years)

Smithsonian Magazine ^ | May 1, 2006 | Helen Fields

[andysandmikesmom]

I especially liked your sentence in your post #636...which reads..."Instead, the Bible reiterates through out, not the "how he did", but that He "did". That is an excellent observation...

[AndrewC]

Lack of substance in reply noted.

Well you should know. You are the epitome of that characteristic.

[ahayes]

Completely Pointless Page Placemarker!

[ml1954]

Well you should know. You are the epitome of that characteristic.

You contradicted yourself. I pointed this out.

[AndrewC]

You contradicted yourself. I pointed this out.

And I demonstrated that you were wrong.

[ml1954]

And I demonstrated that you were wrong.

You did not.

[AndrewC]

You did not.

Of course, I did.

[jennyp]

Are you trying to say that evolutionists always simply dismiss any data that we don't like, and so we're always able to say that the ToE survived falsification?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Exists.

You are hallucinating about holes"

If this evidence against evolution exists, than evolution is falsifiable. YOU don't get to rewrite basic logic.

As for the cloning fraud picture you posted, that shows that his work was falsifiable.

You seem to lack a basic grasp of logic.

[AndrewC]

Are you trying to say that evolutionists always simply dismiss any data that we don't like, and so we're always able to say that the ToE survived falsification?

No, only data that is a danger to the dogma(and I really am speaking of the people here, along with Dawkins and not truly open-minded scientists, of which I consider Dr Shapiro a member). I suspect some reason for the evo non-participation in "IBM Discovery Could Shed New Light on Workings of the Human Genome"

[ml1954]

Of course, I did.

AndrewC: I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed.

Me: This is a contradiction.

You contradicted yourself.

[AndrewC]

If this evidence against evolution exists, than evolution is falsifiable. YOU don't get to rewrite basic logic.

No, but "exists" has a meaning.

[AndrewC]

You contradicted yourself.

No I didn't.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"No, but "exists" has a meaning."

Yes, if evidence against evolution exists, it is falsifiable. You can't claim something is unfalsifiable AND that it has been falsified.

They're starting to throw in the dirt. Better try crawling out while you can.

[AndrewC]

Yes, if evidence against evolution exists, it is falsifiable.

Do you recognize the person in the picture I have been posting?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

You have to understand, in his universe, A does not equal A. Logic doesn't apply. Something can be unfalsifiable AND falsified at the same time. War is peace. Love is hate.

[stands2reason]

If humans are "special" how come we share 98% of our genes with Chimpanzees?

I don't know about mlc, but I believe humans are special because we have immortal souls, not because of anything in our DNA.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Do you recognize the person in the picture I have been posting?"

Yes, he was the scientist whose work was falsified. Nobody could replicate his experiments and he had to own up that he faked his data.

And evolution can't be unfalsifiable and falsified at the same time.

[ml1954]

No I didn't.

Then you should be show how you didn't.

[AndrewC]

Nobody could replicate his experiments and he had to own up that he faked his data.

Oh, so evidence that existed, did not exist.