Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
Are you trying to say that evolutionists always simply dismiss any data that we don't like, and so we're always able to say that the ToE survived falsification?

No, only data that is a danger to the dogma(and I really am speaking of the people here, along with Dawkins and not truly open-minded scientists, of which I consider Dr Shapiro a member). I suspect some reason for the evo non-participation in "IBM Discovery Could Shed New Light on Workings of the Human Genome"

850 posted on 05/02/2006 6:12:18 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

Oh come on, you and I had a long discussion not too long ago about emergent properties of non-coding DNA. Function in "junk DNA" does not contradict evolution, and in fact is entirely consistent with it.


883 posted on 05/02/2006 6:53:30 PM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson