To: RunningWolf
Man you have that calibrated pretty well! Thx, Wolf. ;-)
MM
1,009 posted on
05/02/2006 10:41:34 PM PDT by
MississippiMan
(Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
To: MississippiMan
see #1002 - it wasn't written as a direct response to your #994, but it could easily have been
1,012 posted on
05/02/2006 10:58:57 PM PDT by
King Prout
(many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
To: MississippiMan
MississippiMan,
They want to use this theory of genetic similarity to inist a link to an ancient ape ancestor.
But how does one know that the dna they are looking at has not been altered in several way in the processes used to observe it?
Who can really say that the DNA molecules are not being altered in the process, both loosing and taking on information's that are misleading.
In other words, what they are not looking at 'real dna'. What they are looking at is some bio-chemical facsimile of dna.
Wolf
1,017 posted on
05/02/2006 11:57:03 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson