Sounds just like someone saying the earth was created by God, but he made it LOOK like it was billions of years old just to throw us off the trail.
Fortunately for her, she firmly espouses evolution, so she won't be laughed out of her profession.
At least, so long as she makes certain to criticize creationists at every opportunity. She has to hold off the wolves until they can come up with SOME explanation of how they were so completely wrong about soft tissue, while being so exactly RIGHT about everything else.
Actually, what this shows is how belief in evolution precludes real science. Apparently for DECADES scientists, assuming the earth to be millions of years old, and therefore assuming soft tissue couldn't survive, NEVER EVEN THOUGHT to cut a single bone open to see what was inside -- at least that's what SHE says.
So while the masses assume they say there is no soft tissue because they never FOUND any, it seems they simply never LOOKED for it.
But again, they are evolutionists, so all will be forgiven.
Do you think all dinosaur bones have soft tissue in them and it just hasn't been found yet?
If more bones were tested and none found with soft tissue, what would you conclude from that?