Replies

Hey, skull-man...perhaps you shouldn't read this link and the ones that follow. It seems that your skulls aren't sequential at all, nor are they accurately categorized.

I have examined your link:

http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/emcon.htm

All I see is opinion based on religious belief. The opening line is "When the fossil evidence is viewed from a creationist's point of view..." It goes downhill from there.

For example, point #1 of a list of five is "Modern humans have existed for 4.5 million years, which is before the australopithecines existed by the evolutionists time scale." This is given with no supporting data whatsoever. The closest thing to support is the line,

At the bottom of Bed I in the Olduvai gorge is a circular stone structure 14 ft. in diameter made by humans, similar to those in use today by the Okombambi tribe of Southwest Africa. That means true humans were around 2 million years ago by the evolutionist's time scale, before Homo erectus and the Australopithecines (Lubenow, 1992, 172-173).

This is not convincing: the claim of modern humans at 4.5 million years is not supported by claiming they were there 2.0 million years ago. And that claim is based not on fossil evidence, but on "a circular stone structure 14 ft. in diameter" attributed to humans, but not documented as such.

Your claims, and those of this website, are not standing up to the least bit of scientific scrutiny.

Admit it, you have come to the conclusions you are posting based on your religious belief, not on scientific evidence. You (and the creation sites) are trying to twist the evidence to fit your beliefs. I call this "Pretzel Science."

So far, your scientific credibility is approaching zero. Care to try again?

ps. Do you ever read any of the actual science websites, or is your entire education in this field based on creationist sites?