Once there were only two fossils standing between eohippus and horse, now there are about twenty, occuring in a graded sequence, inside a graded geological sequence, predicted, and then found, and creationists are now happy to claim that every single pair of them have a "fossil gap" between them. The argument doesn't rest on continuous evidence, it rests on inductive reasoning about the fossils that we do see, to explain why they have so much in common, along what looks like a graded continuous spectrum of forms, chemistry, morphology and function. Do you reject the law of universal gravitation because there are large gaps between stars for which no evidence exists. Why are you so concerned about fossil gaps, when the deceitful, left-wing, athiestic stellar gaps are so much larger?
Once there were only three gaps standing between eohippus and horse, now there are twenty-one. The distance is growing!